Search for: "KELLY v. THE STATE"
Results 101 - 120
of 2,309
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 9:05 pm
See generally Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 4:22 pm
[United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 8:00 am
DCG Indiana, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jun 2023, 3:45 am
John v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 2:03 pm
Sisler, 157 N.J. 188, 213, (1999) (quoting Kelly v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 12:42 pm
State v. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am
The part state-owned companies Hikvision and Dahua have been criticised for their links with privacy concerns and human rights abuses in China. [read post]
29 May 2023, 9:01 pm
As Justice Alito’s 2017 majority opinion in Matal v. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:00 am
The Court of Appeals had affirmed the denial of those benefits by Respondents in connection with the evidence submitted on her first two applications (Matter of Salerno v Kelly, 139 AD3d 516.In support of her third attempt, Plaintiff submitted the affidavit of a retired colleague, stating that at the time of the terrorist attack, he was stationed with petitioner at the offices of the Internal Affairs Bureau. [read post]
25 May 2023, 6:00 am
The Court of Appeals had affirmed the denial of those benefits by Respondents in connection with the evidence submitted on her first two applications (Matter of Salerno v Kelly, 139 AD3d 516.In support of her third attempt, Plaintiff submitted the affidavit of a retired colleague, stating that at the time of the terrorist attack, he was stationed with petitioner at the offices of the Internal Affairs Bureau. [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeals had affirmed the denial of those benefits by Respondents in connection with the evidence submitted on her first two applications, Matter of Salerno v Kelly, 139 AD3d 516.In support of her third attempt, Plaintiff submitted the affidavit of a retired colleague, stating that at the time of the terrorist attack, he was stationed with Plaintiff at the offices of the Internal Affairs Bureau. [read post]
25 May 2023, 2:05 am
The Court of Appeals had affirmed the denial of those benefits by Respondents in connection with the evidence submitted on her first two applications, Matter of Salerno v Kelly, 139 AD3d 516.In support of her third attempt, Plaintiff submitted the affidavit of a retired colleague, stating that at the time of the terrorist attack, he was stationed with Plaintiff at the offices of the Internal Affairs Bureau. [read post]
23 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The Comptroller denied a State Trooper's [Petitioner] application for accidental disability retirement benefits. [read post]
23 May 2023, 9:00 pm
The Comptroller denied a State Trooper's [Petitioner] application for accidental disability retirement benefits. [read post]
22 May 2023, 5:16 am
Though seditious conspiracy carries a 20-year maximum penalty, all of the Oath Keeper defendants were convicted of multiple felonies, so the government seeks consecutive sentences in the cases of Rhodes and defendant Kelly Meggs to achieve its recommended 25- and 21-year overall terms for them. [read post]
17 May 2023, 9:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 10:46 pm
As the court previously held in Kelly v. [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:00 am
Following a hearing, the Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's decision, and this CPLR Article 78 proceeding ensued.The Appellate Division, citing Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, sustained the Comptroller's decision, noting, as is relevant here, it is well established that an injury which occurs in the course of an activity undertaken in the performance of the ordinary employment duties of a police officer is not an accidental injury within the meaning of… [read post]
9 May 2023, 6:00 am
Following a hearing, the Comptroller adopted the Hearing Officer's decision, and this CPLR Article 78 proceeding ensued.The Appellate Division, citing Matter of Kelly v DiNapoli, 30 NY3d 674, sustained the Comptroller's decision, noting, as is relevant here, it is well established that an injury which occurs in the course of an activity undertaken in the performance of the ordinary employment duties of a police officer is not an accidental injury within the meaning of… [read post]
