Search for: "KENT A. LAMBERT" Results 101 - 120 of 131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Sep 2007, 3:20 am
Kent (06-1498): docket, petition, brief in opposition, reply. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm by John Elwood
Lambert, 17-1094, the company argues that the court of appeals erred. [read post]
Jeff Bridges (D), Senator Kent Lambert (R) and Senator Lois Court (D), and was passed unanimously by the Legislature, signifying the bipartisan understanding that, in today’s climate, data security is a key issue that must be addressed. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 9:37 am by Conor McEvily
  At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger discusses the decision, commenting that the difference between “the nonretroactivity rule of Teague v. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 11:56 am by Chuck Ramsay
Koewler, Daniel Rochford, Robert Brevik, Chris Kuesel, Tom Rogosheske, Paul Brink, John Kuhn, Jeffrey Samson, Judith Brown, … [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 8:05 am
Perhaps a favorable decision in Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 8:45 am
            This post is from the non-Reed Smith side of the blog. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 8:29 am
Kent case shows how reluctant courts can be to admit that §337(a) means what it says (in Farm Raised Salmon, the pending Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:08 am by Kevin A. Thompson
Kent child pornography case was spot on. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 7:26 pm
Kent was affirmed in an unpublished opinion. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:57 am
We were too busy - and none of our clients would pay for it in any event - so we didn't attend yesterday's Supreme Court oral argument in Riegel v. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 11:22 pm
Warner-Lambert & Co., 467 F.3d 85 (2d Cir. 2006), aff'd by equally divided court, 128 S. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 1:18 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
In the headline to a Dec. 7 press release, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced that it, in concert with the U.S. [read post]
25 Sep 2007, 3:16 am
KENT, KIMBERLY, ET AL.The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
  Friend and fellow law blogger and skeptic,  Jack of Kent, might say that such a statement is ‘misconceived’  and, possibly, ‘illiberal’. [read post]