Search for: "KERR v. SMITH"
Results 101 - 120
of 205
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Dec 2013, 1:35 am
” Reynolds v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 11:41 pm
In Watkins v. [read post]
17 Sep 2013, 6:03 pm
The Fourth Amendment does not bar the government’s proposed collection of telephony metadata, she writes, because the production “is squarely controlled by” Smith v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 1:45 pm
Most Volokh readers know that, and the Fifth Circuit holds (following Smith v. [read post]
29 Jul 2013, 10:38 pm
(Orin Kerr) Two weeks ago, when DOJ petitioned for rehearing en banc in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 9:36 am
He lamented the uncertainty created by the US Supreme Court's odd ruling in US v. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 9:13 pm
Although it’s not an IAC case, the SCOTUS also issued Smith v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 4:26 am
At Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr discusses a good ruling out of the 9th Circuit in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 5:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 9:23 am
” Smith v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 10:41 am
(Orin Kerr) On Tuesday, DOJ filed a brief in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia in United States v. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 9:39 pm
(Orin Kerr) This is the second in a series of posts on the justiciability of Fourth Amendment disputes. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 1:55 pm
Smith, but ended up dismissing the case on procedural grounds. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 11:53 pm
(Orin Kerr) I recently blogged about United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 8:55 am
State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 8:53 am
Briefly: Stanley Fish has a column on United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 7:40 am
Pa. 2010); Smith v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:48 am
The case was heard in April by the Supreme Court Justices Lord Hope, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke, Lord Dyson and Lord Reed. [read post]
11 Apr 2012, 1:08 pm
Epps goes on to explain that the very same decision that established judicial review, Marbury v. [read post]