Search for: "KING v. Davis" Results 101 - 120 of 397
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Jun 2015, 2:39 am by Amy Howe
Andrew Hamm of this blog rounded up early coverage and commentary on yesterday’s decision in King v. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 3:28 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Summary judgment dismissing the entire legal malpractice action was correctly granted [*2]because CAIB failed to present evidence in admissible form sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to proximate cause, which requires a showing that Chadbourne's alleged failure to warn it of potential criminal consequences of its use of the SP Structure proximately caused reasonably ascertainable damages (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434 [2007];… [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 10:54 am by Michael O'Hear
  Given that Alito also wrote the majority opinions in the two Fourth Amendment cases, it is not surprising to see a great deal of jurisprudential similarity between the J.D.B. dissent and the Court’s opinions in King and Davis. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 1:06 am
Kwame Davis Subscription Required KINGS COUNTYLandlord/Tenant Law Factual Issues Exist Regarding Rent Stabilization; Respondent's Motion for Summary Judgment Denied 286 Clinton LLC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2008, 10:02 am
Click here to go to www.nylj.com NEW YORK COUNTYTorts Shareholders in Professional Service Corporation Not Vicariously Liable for Negligence of One Another Davy v. [read post]
9 May 2007, 1:35 am
Doe QUEENS COUNTYCivil PracticeIndividual Respondent Not Party to Arbitration Agreement, Court Lacks Personal Jurisdiction Davis Alarms Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 2:23 pm
The last time an executive body (the King’s Privy Council) invalidated an invention patent on an ordinary application was in 1746, in Darby v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 11:19 pm
Beatrice Davis KINGS COUNTYTrusts and Estates Consideration Believed to Be Too Low, Not Basis To Vacate Otherwise Proper Stipulation Estate of Paul Saviano QUEENS COUNTYCriminal Practice Defendant Knowingly, Voluntarily, Intelligently Waived Right to Jury Trial, Right to Testify People v. [read post]