Search for: "Kavanaugh v. U.s"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,843
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Dec 2023, 7:20 am
The U.S. says it does not.Who's right? [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 7:23 am
Alito’s confirmation in 2006 kicked off a shift to the right that accelerated with the arrival of three justices – Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett – nominated by former President Donald Trump. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:50 am
Justice Brett Kavanaugh noted (without an opinion) that he would grant the petition. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 4:28 am
The decision of the U.S. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:36 am
And in Erlinger v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Lather; rinse; repeat.To be clear, I'd rather that the U.S. win in Rahimi based on the kind of inconsistency I've just described than that the U.S. lose. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:47 pm
In the wake of the Supreme Court’s 2022 decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 2:20 pm
” When Assistant to the U.S. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm
But in Lindke v. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm
Missouri then sought immediate relief from the U.S. [read post]
23 Oct 2023, 5:38 am
Jackson Women's Health Organization (2022) was an ugly, lawless judicial performance by the U.S. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 9:05 pm
” Nor did the Fifth Circuit judges respond to the earlier opinions of Justices Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh and John Roberts in Mutual Pharmaceutical v. [read post]
17 Oct 2023, 5:51 am
New Mexico, 564 U.S. 647 (2011); State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 12:12 pm
Loper Bright Enterprises v. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 7:31 am
” As Justice Kavanaugh put it pithily: “No concrete harm, no standing. [read post]
10 Oct 2023, 1:50 pm
Sackett v. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 8:09 am
For example, in 2022, the U.S. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 1:35 pm
But the U.S. [read post]
3 Oct 2023, 5:25 pm
United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:11 am
The U.S. [read post]
