Search for: "Kendrick v. Kendrick" Results 101 - 120 of 150
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2008, 11:58 am
Craig Kendrick ("Trustee") seeks to avoid a mortgage on the Debtors' real property because the certificate of acknowledgment was defective as the Debtors were not present before the notary when they executed the mortgage. [read post]
7 Mar 2010, 8:11 pm by cdw
[more next week] Kendrick Antonio Simpson v. [read post]
12 Nov 2023, 2:35 am by centerforartlaw
In February 2018, Freenjoy had been accused of copyright infringement for their production of Kendrick Lamar and SZA’s “All the Stars” music video from the Black Panther movie soundtrack. [read post]
31 May 2022, 11:59 am by John Hochfelder
  $20,000,000 for 30 Year Old Man in Construction Site Fall; Perez v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 3:54 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Leslie Kendrick: discrimination in action will be regulable even if it’s coupled with protected thought. [read post]
5 May 2013, 9:33 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Commercial speech v. speaker—corporate entity v. person. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 pm by David Kopel
Kendrick, 244 F. 3d 572, 578–579 (CA7 2001); Entertainment Soft-ware Assn. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 3:06 am by INFORRM
Free Speech and Speaker’s Intent: A Reply to Kendrick,  Larry Alexander, 115 Columbia Law Review Sidebar 1 (2015), SSRN. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 12:05 am by INFORRM
Hawrami v Journalism Development Network Inc and others, 17 June 2024 (Steyn J) Vince v Associated Newspapers, heard 19 February 2024 (HHJ Lewis) Pacini v Dow Jones, heard 13 December 2023 (HHJ Parkes KC) Harcombe v Associated Newspapers, heard 3 to 7 and 10 to 11 July 2023 (Nicklin J) MBR Acres v FREE THE [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am by INFORRM
  On the same day, there were hearings on applications for injunctions in the cases of Payone v Logo and Searl v Dimova-Handley. [read post]
27 Jul 2018, 1:21 pm by Seth Fortin
  That was the question facing the Southern California federal district court in deciding a motion for a preliminary injunction in Founder Starcoin v. [read post]