Search for: "Key v. Richardson"
Results 101 - 120
of 232
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2017, 2:47 pm
Stamer also shares her thought leadership, experience and advocacy on these and other concerns by her service in the leadership of a broad range of other professional and civic organization including her involvement as the Vice Chair of the North Texas Healthcare Compliance Association; Executive Director of the Coalition on Responsible Health Policy and its PROJECT COPE: Coalition on Patient Empowerment; former Board President of the early childhood development intervention agency, The… [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 4:25 pm
This point has not yet been addressed in any reported decision in England and Wales and was left open by Mr Justice Warby in Richardson v Facebook [2015] EWHC 3154 (at [59]). [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 11:37 pm
Dupree, 40 S.W. 962, 964 (Tex. 1897); Richardson v. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 11:10 am
The US Department of Labor (DOL) is appealing the November 22 Nevada v US Department of Labor ruling preliminarily enjoining DOL from implementing or enforcing a modification to the DOL Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) White Collar Exemption Regulations that would have nearly doubled the minimum salary that an employer must pay an employee on a salaried basis in reliance on the White Collar Exemption. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
The key question when addressing added matter was summarised in Richardson-Vicks by R.Jacobs in a single sentence:"I think the test of added matter is whether a skilled man would, upon looking at the amended specification, learn anything about the invention which he could not learn from the un-amended specification". [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 3:26 pm
His November 16, 2016 final order in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 9:23 am
Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973) Commentary: Iselin M. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 1:53 pm
Hardy v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 9:42 pm
In Perez v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 2:30 pm
Lessons For Other Covered Entities From UMMC Resolution Agreement The UMMC charges and Resolution Agreement contains several key lessons for other covered entities and their business associates, which OCR’s July 21, 2016 announcement warns other covered entities and business associates to heed.. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Federal Court of Appeal Provides Guidance in Apotex v Allergan 2016 FCA 155 https://t.co/X4KUlDUe5z -> How soon will the Irish government approve copyright reform? [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
Cable companies take more Android box dealers to court to stamp out 'free TV' https://t.co/oPqKAZfql1 -> Despite Brexit vote, key EU powers vow to ratify CETA deal https://t.co/fI8TXHL8Vz -> Google gets civil restraint order Richardson v Google UK Ltd & Anor [2016] EWHC 1534 https://t.co/Yj36sp5Ssb -> No copyright in digital data signals, says Full Federal Court https://t.co/eP0Z6kGTJo -> China ‘will enter’the Trans-Pacific Partnership… [read post]
3 Jul 2016, 4:09 pm
Bailii has recently made available a judgment of 22 June 2016 in the case of Richardson v Google UK Ltd [2016] EWHC 1534 (QB)) in which Sir David Eady made an extended civil restraint order against the claimant. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 2:32 am
There has been some discussion regarding the merits of the decision of the English Court of Appeal in the case of Richardson v Pitt-Stanley [1995] QB 123 over the last 20 years (see, for example, paragraphs 5.15 & 13.12 of Munkman on Employer’s Liability, 16th Edition). [read post]
26 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
On 22 June 2016, Sir David Eady heard applications in the case of Richardson v Google UK Ltd. [read post]
31 May 2016, 4:05 pm
Self-insured employer or union sponsored health plans (Plans), their fiduciaries, third party administrative or other service providers, and sponsors should consult legal counsel for advice about whether their Plans might violate the Privacy Rule of the Health Insurance Portability & Accountability Act (HIPAA) by disclosing individually identifiable claims or other Plan records or data to a state “all payer” claims or other data base in response to a state law or regulation mandating… [read post]
18 Mar 2016, 10:42 am
Key also voiced his approval for the Philippines v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 5:00 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) and their insurers are not required to comply with a Vermont state law that requires health insurers and certain other parties to report payments relating to health care claims and other information relating to health care services to a state agency for compilation in an all-inclusive health care database, according to the United States Supreme Court’s March 1, 2016 ruling in… [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 6:12 am
Briere v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 7:23 am
Thus, her race discrimination and retaliation claims could proceed as to those actions and summary judgment was denied in part (Richardson v. [read post]
