Search for: "Keys v. Duke University"
Results 101 - 120
of 160
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2013, 7:44 am
In 1986 he had argued and won a unanimous decision in a key Voting Rights Act case,Thornberg v. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 5:01 am
In addition, Roberts noted that Duke had failed to address whether the Department of Homeland Security could bifurcate the DACA program, ending the portion of the pr [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
7 Feb 2020, 12:43 am
This apparent freedom might translate in a different approach of UK legislature and courts to key IP issues. [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 1:11 am
The LSE Media blog has published an article analysing the guidance from key transnational bodies on regulating AI with the best interests of children in mind. 5RB published a blog post reviewing the Online Safety Act 2023, which was given royal assent on 26 October. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
: (Public Knowledge), WIPO Copyright Committee 16th session to discuss Broadcast Treaty, new proposal for exceptions and limitations agreement: (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Public Knowledge), (Public Knowledge), (IPwar’s), (Intellectual Property Watch), (KEI), (Public Knowledge), (IP Justice), (IP Justice), (KEI), (KEI), (KEI), (WIPO), ‘Year of filters’ turning into year of lawsuits against… [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am
IPSO 19756-23 Saunders v mirror.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation 19679-23 Saunders v walesonline.co.uk, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigation Resolution Statement 18579-23 Reynolds v The Scottish Sun, 1 Accuracy (2021), Resolved – IPSO mediated 18539-23 Garnier v Tenbury Wells Advertiser, 2 Privacy (2021), 1 Accuracy (2021), No breach – after investigatio 17700-23… [read post]
27 Mar 2020, 6:01 am
Emmerich, and Sabastian V. [read post]
16 Jun 2006, 3:49 am
Justin Kruger of New York University and Nicholas Epley of the University of Chicago focused on how well sarcasm is detected in electronic messages. [read post]
25 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
While Lessig treats Marshall’s opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
The basis of the appeal is that the lower court failed to consider key evidence and the broader context of the comments, which his legal team argue were politi [read post]
20 May 2024, 8:06 am
Shugerman, SEC v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 7:45 am
Its importance was further highlighted by the abortive case of New Hampshire v. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 7:45 am
Its importance was further highlighted by the abortive case of New Hampshire v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On 28 July 2022, there were hearings in ABC and Others v London Borough of Lambeth and SJU and Others v London Borough of Lambeth before Nicklin J and in Nicolaisen v Nicolaisen before Jay J. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 6:35 am
Dukes), but others go the other way (Wyeth v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am
The Supreme Court of New Zealand 2004-2013© 2015 Thomson Reuters New Zealandedited by Matthew Barber and Mary-Rose Russell, Senior Lecturers in Law, Auckland University of Technology Excerpt: selections from Chapter 3: A Barrister’s Perspective by James Farmer QC [Footnotes omitted. [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 7:52 am
” City of Cleburne v. [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 4:51 pm
In Texas v. [read post]
