Search for: "Kind v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 21,132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2010, 9:13 am
Wilkins, 1 Smith’s (N.H.) 1 (1803) — a little-cited but very interesting case that illustrates how strong religious freedom and separation-of-church-and-state rhetoric and belief coexisted in at least some judicial minds of the era with strong support for certain kinds of government funding of religion. [read post]
21 Jun 2021, 1:01 am
” An NPR article on Guinn v. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in Cambridge Christian School v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 3:25 pm
The court then turns to United States v. [read post]
5 May 2007, 9:32 pm
As opposed to the State, a criminal defendant has no right to immediately appeal a circuit court's decision not to suppress evidence and has no right to pursue a cross-appeal in a State's appeal under CJ section 12-302(c)(3). [read post]
18 Oct 2013, 4:42 pm
It is not the kind of barrier to the assertion of state authority that Thomas Becket had in mind. [read post]
23 Mar 2020, 1:30 pm
Supreme Court about state sovereign immunity in copyright, Allen v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 9:00 pm
In Blakely v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 2:00 am
United States and Collins v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 4:02 am
Justin Amador v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 8:28 am
Co. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:57 pm
The United States Supreme Court decision of United States v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 8:45 am
Just a few months after Reynolds was murdered, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Ake v. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
On July 8, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 6:47 am
State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 9:49 am
On March 12, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in State v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 10:54 am
Hood v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 6:55 am
As this Court made very clear in State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 6:37 am
State v. [read post]
26 Jun 2023, 4:30 am
And when a State asserts, for example, that a federal law has produced only those kinds of indirect effects, the State's claim for standing can become more attenuated. [read post]
