Search for: "King v. Bush"
Results 101 - 120
of 257
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jan 2016, 9:30 am
Gerard Magliocca, buoyed by the ACA surviving a second Supreme Court review in King v. [read post]
15 Nov 2015, 7:48 pm
(When it later moved the INS from the Department of Justice to DHS, Congress transferred this and other authorities from the Attorney General to the DHS Secretary.)When the Texas v. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 11:13 am
”Burke v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 9:01 pm
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
3 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
On King v. [read post]
13 Jul 2015, 10:40 am
” In any other year, King v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:43 pm
Bush was President, generally have required an employer prove that an employee meets each of three tests for one of the FLSA’s White Collar Exemptions to apply: The employee must be paid a predetermined and fixed salary that is not subject to reduction because of variations in the quality or quantity of work performed; The amount of salary paid must meet a minimum specified amount; and The employee’s job duties must primarily involve executive, administrative, or professional… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:41 am
” But it will just as easily –indeed more likely — get you a “deferential” judge who moves heaven and earth to uphold the constitutionality of laws as in NFIB, or defers to the “intent” or purpose of the Congress that enacted the law as in King v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 3:30 pm
He cited Lochner v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 8:27 pm
Last year, in Loving v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:35 pm
In King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 10:31 am
Supreme Court issued its decision in King v. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 8:05 am
Bush and William J. [read post]
17 Jun 2015, 2:56 am
President Obama’s recent remarks about King v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 10:31 am
Bush had given a speech in May 2008 — shortly before the Supreme Court’s decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 12:39 pm
Yesterday in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 7:26 am
Too much water under the bridge at this point (even before we get to see what they do in King v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 9:01 pm
But beginning with Bush v. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:50 am
Finally, it is unsettling to see Jack positively refer to Bush v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 9:33 am
In Swann v. [read post]
