Search for: "King v. Texas"
Results 101 - 120
of 847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Nov 2020, 7:39 am
King California v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 2:17 pm
Texas Supreme Court Ruling in King The key case in this area of law is a 2002 decision by the Texas Supreme Court in King v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 10:40 am
D/B/A KINGS AIRE, INC. v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 2:53 pm
In 1979, the Supreme court looked at whether optometrists in Texas could use trade names in Friedman v. [read post]
8 Jul 2019, 8:09 pm
Texas v. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 5:19 am
In Lackey v. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 5:15 am
The challenges, however, hit their own high water mark when the Supreme Court granted review in King v. [read post]
24 Jun 2023, 8:30 am
V. [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 6:08 am
Thanks, Texas and Wisconsin. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 7:39 am
However, that court left the act in place pending appeal (Texas v. [read post]
19 Jun 2021, 6:39 am
Sebelius and King v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 8:59 am
"Here" = King v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 4:53 am
Coverage of and commentary related to the Court continue to focus on King v. [read post]
20 May 2007, 2:14 am
All of these items are in the Senate proposal but not the House:$50 million to implement a TYC rehabilitation plan$35 million more for community corrections of youth (more important than ever since we're releasing kids from TYC)$100 million more for community-based treatment programs for adults.$43 million more to bring TDCJ healthcare up to minimum constitutional standards.$10 million more to probation departments for basic supervision funds.So that's $238 million in extra spending… [read post]
12 Sep 2014, 11:50 am
King (2006) This 2006 order from the U.S. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:23 am
Other coverage of and commentary on the Court focus on two of the Court’ highest-profile cases this Term: King v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 12:17 pm
In Harper v. [read post]
22 Jun 2015, 2:25 am
One of the most highly anticipated cases still outstanding is King v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm
The basic underlying legal issue in the case (titled Texas v. [read post]
