Search for: "Kiobel v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co."
Results 101 - 120
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Nov 2011, 3:35 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 621 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 2010), that the scope of liability under the ATS does not extend to corporations because imposing liability on corporations for violations of the law of nations has not achieved a sufficiently “specific, universal, and obligatory” character so as to be considered a norm of customary international law. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:17 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 226 F.3d 88, 91-92 (2d Cir. 2000); Beanal v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:12 am
In Kiobel v. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 6:54 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 133 S.Ct 1659 (2013), the Court faced the question of whether the ATS permits a claim based on “conduct occurring in the territory of a foreign sovereign. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 4:29 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., cases we've tracked in prior posts available here, were to have been considered by the Court on Friday.)? [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 7:41 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum, in which the Court will consider whether corporations can be sued under the Alien Tort Statute; he argues that “[i]n the year since it was decided, Kiobel has come under serious attack, and upholding the decision would be an embarrassment. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 5:00 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 621 F.3d 111 (2d Cir. 2010). [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 3:00 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 3:12 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., issuance of the writ was unnecessary in this case because defendants have an adequate means of relief through a motion for judgment on the pleadings; plaintiffs’ arguments that Kiobel did not apply where defendants were American citizens, or where the case involved American interests, were without merit; and, because the Kiobel decision plainly foreclosed plaintiffs’ claims as a matter of law, the court need… [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. applied the presumption of extraterritoriality to the ATS and concluded that courts had jurisdiction only over ATS claims that “touch and concern” the territory of the United States with “sufficient force. [read post]
2 Dec 2023, 1:45 pm
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 569 U.S. 108, 119 (2013) (citing Morrison, 561 U.S., at 265). [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 11:24 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 4:39 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co., 569 U.S. 108 (2013). [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:03 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Mohamad v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 7:19 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum, holding that the Alien Tort Statute does not authorize a suit by Nigerian nationals against foreign corporations for their conduct overseas. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 7:46 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co.), putting the total number of opinions in line with rates from OT08 (13), OT09 (11), and OT10 (13). [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 6:28 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum continues, with posts by Ingrid Wuerth and Beth Stephens. [read post]
12 May 2014, 7:47 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum), treaty self-execution and executive pre-emption (Medellin v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:00 am
Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. (0) Ninth Circuit Find Personal Jurisdiction Over DamilerChrysler AG under the ATS; Upholds “Agency” Rather than Alter-Ego Jurisdiction (0) Eleventh Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Even U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 6:37 am
Dutch Royal Petroleum Co., a case about corporate liability under the Alien Tort Statute. [read post]
