Search for: "Knight v. Thomas" Results 101 - 120 of 158
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2010, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
Next Week in the Courts On Monday 6 December 2010, Mr Justice Tugendhat will hear an application in the case of Etherington v Associated Newspapers Ltd [Update 2] On Thursday 9 December 2010, the Court of Appeal will hand down judgment in the case of Clift v Slough BC (on appeal from [2009] EWHC 1550 (QB)) Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and… [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 11:41 am by Kevin LaCroix
In their article in the INSURANCE JOURNAL the Holland & Knight’s lawyers emphasize: “The larger the damages award at trial, the greater defendant’s motivation to pursue a vigorous appellate challenge to that outcome. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 9:52 am by Eric Goldman
Another #MAGA opinion from a Trump-appointed Federalist Society judge, and a full-throated work of Justice Thomas fandom. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 11:33 am by Susan Brenner
Thomas, 2012–Ohio–2430 (Ohio Court of Appeals 2012). [read post]
9 May 2022, 1:35 am by INFORRM
In a statement from MP Julian Knight, the DCMS is said to be “keen to learn more about how Mr. [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 2:53 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Although denial of certiorari (meaning simply that the high court declines to hear the case) does not form a precedent binding on lower courts, the consistency of rejection of this claim has generally been understood as a signal that the issue was dead.Prior posts on the high court's rejection of Lackey claims are here, here, here, here, and here.Justice Thomas noted in Knight v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:07 am by Eric Goldman
  This post will discuss only one Section 230 ruling, the Bolger v. [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
The ASA website had a news report “Consumers warned of Thomas Cook refund scams”. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am by John Elwood
  Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Justices Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch, has already opined that “there is a strong likelihood that the [Pennsylvania] Supreme Court decision violates the Federal Constitution. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
Research & resources The Justice Gap website is also supporting the ‘Open Justice Week’ initiative (see events, below) and has published a guide to reporting the English courts by Kim Evans, with input from David Banks, Philippa Thomas and Rupert Evelyn. [read post]