Search for: "Koch v. Koch" Results 101 - 120 of 563
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Apr 2019, 4:46 am by Cody Bassham
JUDICIAL: BREAKING FREE, LLC, & CONNIE BUTTRAM, Plaintiffs, v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Here is the schedule for the 2019 Health Law Professors Conference. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
”* As the Court of Appeals held in Boyle v Koch, 68 NY2d 60, an employee's probationary period may be extended in the event the employee is given a “light duty” or some other alternate assignment while serving as a probationer. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
”* As the Court of Appeals held in Boyle v Koch, 68 NY2d 60, an employee's probationary period may be extended in the event the employee is given a “light duty” or some other alternate assignment while serving as a probationer. [read post]
22 Feb 2019, 2:56 am by Walter Olson
The less you know: new push to “de-bias” faculty recruiting by removing CVs and interviews from the process [John Morgan, Times Higher Ed/Inside Higher Ed on developments in Britain] “You Can’t Make This Up: A Speech Code that Investigates Students for Discussing the Freedom of Speech” [University of South Carolina: Ilya Shapiro and Patrick Moran on Cato certiorari brief in Abbott v. [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Otherwise the minimum and maximum periods of the probationary term of the employee are extended by the number of workdays of such absences not counted as time served in the probationary term” [see, for example, 4 NYCRR 4.5(g), “Absence during probationary term”].Another element to consider is the extension of the probationary period in the event an employee is given a “light duty” or some other alternate assignment while serving his or her probationary period [see Boyle… [read post]
19 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Otherwise the minimum and maximum periods of the probationary term of the employee are extended by the number of workdays of such absences not counted as time served in the probationary term” [see, for example, 4 NYCRR 4.5(g), “Absence during probationary term”].Another element to consider is the extension of the probationary period in the event an employee is given a “light duty” or some other alternate assignment while serving his or her probationary period [see Boyle… [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 3:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Koch, 39 A.3d 996, 1005 (Pa. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 3:04 am
For practitioners the message was that whilst there may be a grace period for adjustments post-Brexit, it may be wiser to take action now in order to avoid issues such as being unable to service clients, and the rush to meet EUIPO guides that will likely incur high costs.The Keynote: Key Trade Mark Cases of the Last 12 monthsBenet Brandreth QC (11 South Square) gave an enthusiastic review of some of the most interesting Trade Mark cases in the last 12 months; such as Cartier v B Sky B;… [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Boyle v Koch, 114 AD2 78, leave to appeal denied 68 NY2d 601, the court held that an injured firefighter may not claim to have performed the duties of the position to which he or she has been appointed as a probationer on the basis of his or her satisfactory performance of "light duty. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In Boyle v Koch, 114 AD2 78, leave to appeal denied 68 NY2d 601, the court held that an injured firefighter may not claim to have performed the duties of the position to which he or she has been appointed as a probationer on the basis of his or her satisfactory performance of "light duty. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 1:31 pm by Lovechilde
  Kavanaugh's confirmation, as well as the chipping away of Roe v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 1:31 pm by Lovechilde
  Kavanaugh's confirmation, as well as the chipping away of Roe v. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 10:00 pm by Jim Sedor
She has said she would not vote to confirm a nominee who was hostile to Roe v. [read post]