Search for: "Koh v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 350
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Jan 2019, 6:21 am
The FTC's trial brief says "MediaTek [...] began supplying CDMA modem chips for use in handsets sold in China in 2015 and for use in handsets sold in the United States in 2016. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 4:09 am
It's in stark contrast to what the firm's founder, John Quinn, told Judge Lucy Koh of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California at a 2014 Apple v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 12:23 pm
In this FTC v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 4:11 am
In the first case, Frank v. [read post]
12 Oct 2018, 11:15 pm
Just imagine how many people--outside of its own organization and apart from its shareholders--Qualcomm would make happy with such an involuntary gift...One of the reasons for which Qualcomm wants the United States Court of Appeal for the Ninth Circuit to overturn Judge Koh's class certification is plain feasibility. [read post]
29 Sep 2018, 12:24 am
Smartphone Purchasers v. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 11:58 am
"If only 1% of all class action plaintiffs wanted to attend the January FTC v. [read post]
1 Sep 2018, 8:47 am
Four months prior to the FTC v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 10:32 pm
And for the FTC v. [read post]
4 Jul 2018, 7:30 am
Yale-Loehr," Forbes, 27 June 2018 [text via LexisNexis]US Supreme Court Disregards Trump’s Discriminatory Words to Uphold Travel Ban (Human Rights Watch, June 2018) [text]Related post:- Regional Focus: United States - Pt. 1 (4 July 2018)Tagged Publications. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 8:00 am
United States, in Trump v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 7:50 am
People United for Medical Marijuana Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2018, 12:09 pm
Koh) or one or more components? [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:58 am
Koh calls it. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:17 pm
But Judge Koh's cherished "Groundhog Day" principle is that what wasn't allowed at previous Apple v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 8:03 pm
For example, the Munich I Regional Court will hold a Qualcomm v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 9:30 pm
United States, 506 U.S. 224 (1993), and Zivotofsky v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 8:13 pm
In connection with the FTC's antitrust lawsuit against Qualcomm, Magistrate Judge Nathaniel Cousins of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California crafted a "Christmas present" for Apple that the iPhone maker would probably have liked to return to the shop immediately: a sanctions order ($25K per day starting December 16) and a December 29 deadline for the production of documents. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 9:37 am
v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 4:08 am
The top U.S. court's decision follows (literally and figuratively) the position taken by the Solicitor General of the United States, which was not a given but isn't much of a surprise either.While I still believe the three Federal Circuit panel judges who threw out the $119 million decision got it right, the Supreme Court can only hear a limited number of cases per year. [read post]
