Search for: "LAKE PROPERTY OWNERS"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,299
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Feb 2013, 8:52 am
From what we can gather, there's a movement afoot by property owners along Highway 43 in Dunthorpe to bring legal action to take back the abandoned rail right-of-way through their area, a move that might kill off any lingering Lake O. train fantasies permanently. [read post]
6 May 2015, 10:16 am
Have there been previous incidents of violence on or near the property and, if so, what security precautions were implemented by the owner and management to protect residents and deter possible future crime? [read post]
28 Feb 2015, 9:54 pm
Despite the evidence that, in the decades following the execution of the Borst judgment, Sandy Knolls, as partial successor to the Borst property, and a majority of lakefront property owners had expressed a clear interest in the continued operation of the dam in order to stabilize water levels, Supreme Court found that the importance of ensuring that the Borst judgment maintained its “element of finality” was a prevailing concern. [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 9:07 am
Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 12:01 pm
Now is a great time to buy, because many owners need to sell. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
A deep-water drop-off in a lake may or may not constitute a concealed danger so as to impose liability on the property owner in a drowning case. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 7:11 pm
A deep-water drop-off in a lake may or may not constitute a concealed danger so as to impose liability on the property owner in a drowning case. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 8:00 am
Under current law, a waterfront property owner owns the beach – down to the low water mark – that is “attached” to his or her upland property. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 3:36 pm
" Last fall, the city issued an open letter to rental and commercial property owners, threatening criminal fines of $1,000 or more and up to six months in jail for collectives if landlords did not stop leasing to dispensaries. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:52 am
Our Legal Take Generally, property owners are required to protect all guests legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. [read post]
24 Sep 2006, 8:03 pm
Had the drafters of these regulations understood, or simply thought about, the ways in which property owners might respond, they might have taken a better approach, one that would not have spawned a run on logging permits. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 11:32 am
Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 7:40 pm
Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 7:06 pm
The theory is that the current owners of the property are in a position to not only know about latent defects in a house that can cost the new owners thousands of dollars in repairs, but they are also in a position to conceal these defects. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:36 am
The city of Lake Worth, Florida only allows the sale of dogs and cats on the same property where they were bred, which effectively prohibits pet shops from selling animals. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 11:36 am
The city of Lake Worth, Florida only allows the sale of dogs and cats on the same property where they were bred, which effectively prohibits pet shops from selling animals. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 5:51 pm
Generally, property owners are required to protect all those legally on the premises from any foreseeable harm. [read post]
22 Jan 2020, 7:45 am
Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 11:41 am
Police would like to talk to the owner of this boat. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 8:05 am
Property owners are generally required to protect against foreseeable harm to anyone and everyone legally on the premises. [read post]
