Search for: "LANCASTER v STATE" Results 101 - 120 of 335
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Nov 2016, 11:19 am by Matthew Landis
For a discussion of the case and how the Court reached its decision, the full text of the opinion can be found here: In the Matter of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Department of State, Bureau of Professional and Occupational Affairs (State Board of Nursing Investigation No. 14-51-05195) v. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:24 pm by John A. Gallagher
Branstad, Governor of The State of Iowa; Paul Lepage, Governor of the State of Maine; Susana Martinez, Governor of The State of New Mexico; Governor Phil Bryant of the State of Mississippi; and Attorney General Bill Schuette on Behalf of the People of Michigan, Plaintiffs,                                                       … [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 7:26 pm by John A. Gallagher
Cmwlth. 2000) (holding that claimant who quit to return to another state to care for his emotionally disturbed child was eligible for benefits); Miksic v. [read post]
24 May 2016, 6:40 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Supreme Court held an oral hearing of the application for permission to appeal in the case of R (Shindler & Anor) v Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster & Anor, with the appeal to follow immediately if permission to appeal was granted. [read post]
23 May 2016, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12-14 January 2016. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:18 am by Joy Waltemath
Circuit found it must defer to the Board’s conclusion that the musicians were employees where the case presented a choice between “two fairly conflicting views” (Lancaster Symphony Orchestra v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm by Matthew Landis
United States – barring police from using a thermal-imaging device to look into a home Florida v. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 12:58 pm by Russell, Krafft & Gruber, LLP
In the number one spot is the Supreme Court’s decision in Obergefell v. [read post]