Search for: "LEWIS v. SENIOR JUDGES" Results 101 - 120 of 169
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Sep 2020, 3:44 pm by David Kopel
(Senior status judges do not vote on or participate in en bancs.) [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 8:40 am by John Elwood
Wheeler, 18-420, Lewis v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
Our comment on the same judge’s important ruling earlier in the same litigation is here. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 5:46 pm by INFORRM
The Jewish Chronicle, its editor and a senior journalist have been ordered to pay damages to a councillor and teacher accused of inviting an anti-Semitic activist to a political event. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 9:08 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-8860, Lewis v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 11:59 pm
And yet this week the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Baze v. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm by Mark Murakami
Matteoni, Matteoni O’Laughlin & Hechtman, San Jose, California, Edward V. [read post]
19 Mar 2017, 5:05 pm by INFORRM
On the same date there was a hearing in the case of PTW v WPT before Lewis J who gave an ex tempore judgment. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:30 am by INFORRM
We mentioned his blog post about Lewis in last week’s round-up. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
Bannon’s trial, which the judge expects to take as much as two weeks, will be before a jury. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 4:02 am
§ 1679, et seq., prohibits provisions that purport to waive a consumer's right to sue in court for CROA violations.Pregnant welder sues employer for discriminationRoetzel & AndressOn August 10, 2010, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision in Spees v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm by Tom Goldstein
  (This was the exceptionally rare case of the five most junior Justices joining together against all their senior colleagues.) [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Judges gave evidence to the Joint Committee for Privacy and Injunctions last Monday and an uncorrected transcript is available here (PDF). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am by INFORRM
Judge Lewis found that the claimant had a realistic prospect of success in establishing facts on which publication could be inferred and therefore dismissed the application [42]. [read post]