Search for: "Lambeth v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 144
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2009, 4:33 pm
Unlike Kay v Lambeth and Connors, both Smith v Evans and the present case involved proceedings brought after s.211 of the Housing Act 2004 came into effect, amending s.4 Caravan Sites Act 1968 to remove the exemption of local authorities from the court’s power to suspend execution of a possession order,. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 2:56 pm
On 29 June 2022, there were applications in ABC and Others v London Borough of Lambeth and Others v London Borough of Lambeth before Nicklin J. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
In Kay v Lambeth [2006] 2 AC 465 the majority of the House of Lords established that, where a landlord has an otherwise unqualified right to possession, there are only two scenarios where the court should not proceed to summary judgment and an order for possession, which have since become known as gateways (a) and (b) (Lord Hope's now famous [110]). [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 12:53 am
In Kay v Lambeth [2006] 2 AC 465 the majority of the House of Lords established that, where a landlord has an otherwise unqualified right to possession, there are only two scenarios where the court should not proceed to summary judgment and an order for possession, which have since become known as gateways (a) and (b) (Lord Hope's now famous [110]). [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:23 am
Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Lambeth v Loveridge, heard 21 October 2014. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 7:23 am
The London Borough of Lambeth v Gniewosz (2020) UKUT 274 (LC) Replacement of a roof was a ‘repair’ under the relevant lease clause. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 6:58 am
Mr Justice Eady's judgment contains a potted history of human rights and public law challenges to summary possession proceedings, from Kay v Lambeth to Manchester CC v Pinnock and Hounslow LBC v Powell. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
10 Mar 2024, 12:39 pm
No prejudice to the leaseholders had been found by the FTT, pursuant to Daejan Investments Ltd v Benson (2013) UKSC 14. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
United States Last week, President Biden established the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse, which appears will be focusing particularly on online harms which “disproportionately affect women, girls, people of colour and LGBTQI+ individuals” with “technology-facilitated gender-based violence” its top priority. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm
That offer was contained in a letter which stated that: [W]e only have to offer you accommodation once. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 2:39 pm
That offer was contained in a letter which stated that: [W]e only have to offer you accommodation once. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 11:16 pm
The application for permission was refused by HHJ Gibson at Lambeth County Court. [read post]
4 May 2017, 2:57 pm
Diaz v Karim [2017] EWHC 595 (QB) The schedule of special damages – never straightforward. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 7:06 pm
(Jewell's Lessee v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 1:34 pm
Lambeth County Court Registrar, [1969] 1 All E.R. 782 (C.A.). [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 12:11 pm
On 28 July 2022, there were hearings in ABC and Others v London Borough of Lambeth and SJU and Others v London Borough of Lambeth before Nicklin J and in Nicolaisen v Nicolaisen before Jay J. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]
21 Aug 2022, 12:35 am
“Lambeth ‘Calls’, Lambeth I.10, and the nature of the Anglican Communion (2), 29 July 2022. [read post]
