Search for: "Land v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 13,212
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm
State Lands Com. v. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:00 am
With regard to the state’s reliance on Ward v. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 1:27 am
Krauser.John Ellwood Hinebaugh devised a large parcel of land to the Sebolds provided they, among other things, did not alienate their interest in the property and continued to farm it. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 6:19 am
What a case — McGuire v. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 6:19 am
What a case — McGuire v. [read post]
21 Jun 2007, 8:18 pm
Warley that states are prohibited from restricting the alienation of lands on the basis of race, color or national origin. [read post]
1 May 2009, 2:38 am
Apostolides v Orams and Another Court of Justice of the European Communities “The fact that a judgment given in a member state of the European Community concerned land in a part of that state over which the state did not exercise effective control did not mean that the judgment was not subject to recognition and enforcement in [...] [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:01 am
Sturgeon v. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 4:00 am
In Apache Stronghold v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 4:11 am
Del-Prairie Stock Farm, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 6:34 am
Here: State of Kansas v National Indian Gaming Comn Cert Petition Question presented: Whether NIGC legal opinions that determine whether Indian lands are eligible for gaming under IGRA are reviewable final agency actions. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:36 am
The State Aeronautics Act is not commonly the subject of land use lawsuits, but it was for the Sixth District Court of Appeal in the case of Watsonville Pilots Association v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 9:05 am
In Tymoczko v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 1:18 am
Under the Constitution Federal law is the supreme law of the land and where there is a conflict between Federal and State law Federal law is determinative. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 12:03 pm
San Francisco Baykeeper, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:55 am
But then there is dicta in US v Chicago, 48 US 185 (1849), opinion that "land within a State purchased by the United States as a mere proprietor, and not reserved or appropriated for any special purpose, may be liable to condemnation for streets or highways, like the land of other proprietors, under the rights of eminent domain. [read post]
22 Sep 2023, 3:00 pm
In Huck v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 6:56 am
The question here is whether this symbolic resolution strips Hawaii of its sovereign authority to sell, exchange, or transfer 1.2 million acres of state land--29 percent of the total land area of the State and almost all the land owned by the State--unless and until it reaches a political settlement with native Hawaiians about the status of that land.Here's how the OHA stated it:Whether the Hawaii Supreme Court acted within its… [read post]
25 Oct 2017, 11:14 am
” The case is U.S. v. [read post]
8 May 2013, 6:33 am
Bureau of Land Management, held that the BLM violated the National Environmental Policy Act in its assessment of oil and gas leases on federal lands in California. [read post]