Search for: "Lanham v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 1,021
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Sep 2022, 1:34 pm
MSCHF appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. [read post]
2 Sep 2022, 3:31 pm
United States 22-118Issues: (1) Whether the jury clauses of Article III and the Sixth Amendment or the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment bar a court from imposing a more severe criminal sentence on the basis of conduct that a jury necessarily rejected, given its verdicts of acquittal on other counts at the same trial; (2) whether the Supreme Court‘s decision in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2022, 5:00 am
United States Hermès Int’l v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
In Meenaxi Enter. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2022, 6:34 am
In Meenaxi Enter. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2022, 6:31 am
Case date: 21 April 2022 Case number: No. 19-55864 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 8:20 am
Case date: 24 June 2022 Case number: No. 18-302 Court: Supreme Court of the United States A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 5:55 am
And in United States v. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 1:29 pm
Max Rack, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 7:30 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 4:49 pm
v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 9:04 am
Coca-Cola has not presented any survey evidence showing awareness of either mark in the United States. . . . [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Introduction: Robert Burrell Australia/NZ is probably unusual b/c abandonment plays 3 distinct roles: (1) not a purely rhetorical device. 1863 case: from the moment you first use a TM, you have a property right—no goodwill, no reputation required. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 10:10 am
” And it was “directed at or readily accessible to United States consumers,” republished on online websites. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 1:15 pm
Alcon Vision, LLC v. [read post]
31 May 2022, 6:48 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) and the District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia have barred such inventions from being patented. [read post]
31 May 2022, 3:26 am
Creel Abogados, S.C. and Carlos Creel Carrera v. [read post]
18 May 2022, 5:11 pm
From Hermes Int'l v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 5:01 am
In WhatsApp Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 8:33 am
Case date: 07 March 2022 Case number: No. 19-56138 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
