Search for: "Law v Dillon"
Results 101 - 120
of 334
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2019, 5:12 am
Dillon v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:37 pm
One very recent case that involves all three of these areas of eminent domain law is Hilliard v. [read post]
14 Feb 2019, 4:44 am
The official explanatory statement of the Bill mentions certain examples of the required “close connection” such as (i) hedging transactions, (ii) lifecycle events, (iii) netting transactions, (iv) prolongations or (v) the exercise of contractual option or conversion rights. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 5:30 am
In Dillon v. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 9:01 pm
After Dillon v. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 4:20 am
No. 30 – Dillon Aff at~ 13). [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 10:25 am
The Supreme Court, however, recognized Congress’s power to fix time limits in Dillon v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:29 am
Petrotech Resources Corp., 325 S.W.3d 302, 313 (Ky. 2010); Balboa Island Village Inn, 156 P.3d at 352 (Cal.); Sid Dillon Chevrolet v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 9:02 am
But in 2010, in Dillon v. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 3:52 am
Dillon, 938 F.2d 1412 (1st Cir.1991); Suppa, 799 F.2d at 119; United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 5:00 pm
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 10:17 am
See, e.g., Board ofTrade ofCity ofChicago v. [read post]
31 Jan 2018, 3:53 am
” The voluntary payment doctrine “bars recovery of payments voluntarily made with full knowledge of the facts, and in the absence of fraud or mistake of material fact or law” (Dillon v U-A Columbia Cablevision of Westchester, 100 NY2d 525 [2003]). [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 10:14 am
Donohue v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 1:25 pm
’” (Dillon v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 11:34 am
State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm
Such payments were made in satisfaction of defendant’s own contractual obligations and did not constitute voluntary payments contemplated under Domestic Relations Law § 236(B) (7) (a) In Aristova v. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 12:07 pm
Such payments were made in satisfaction of defendant’s own contractual obligations and did not constitute voluntary payments contemplated under Domestic Relations Law § 236(B) (7) (a) In Aristova v. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Amendment to Civil Service Law §167(8) does not violate the compensation clause for certain judges set out in Article VI, §25[a] of the State Constitution Bransten v State of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 08168, Court of AppealsIn 2011 the State-employee unions, in the course of collective bargaining, agreed to a percentage reduction to the State's employer contributions for health insurance to avoid layoff, salary freezes and unpaid furloughs. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 11:36 am
Judge Dillon dissented. [read post]
