Search for: "Law v. International Union of Operating Engineers"
Results 101 - 120
of 269
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2018, 5:28 pm
The cases, listed newest to oldest, and the Court’s summaries are as follows: Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am
One of the more incredible allegations about Prenda Law, the copyright-trolling operation that sued people for downloading movies online, was that the lawyers behind Prenda and its associated companies might have created and uploaded some of the porn, simply as a way of catching more offenders. [read post]
30 Nov 2017, 4:26 am
Brean for this guest post that stems from his new paper on international patent law issues titled Business Methods, Technology, and Discrimination. [read post]
19 Nov 2017, 5:45 am
While their operations are global, they often seek, as in this case, to have only the laws of the U.S. apply to their businesses. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:22 pm
Nick Feamster of the Princeton Computer Science Department and Evan Engstrom of Engine recently wrote in detail about why filters often don’t work. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 2:01 pm
But it is also based around an operational core ideal: that non-state non-judicial mechanisms will constitute the front line of effective operation of a system the core objective of which is effective and direct remediation (UNGP ¶ 29). [read post]
5 Oct 2017, 3:33 pm
Nick Feamster of the Princeton Computer Science Department and Evan Engstrom of Engine recently wrote in detail about why filters often don’t work. [read post]
2 Oct 2017, 1:57 am
As reported by this blog a few months ago, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has been required to address issues of lawfulness - notably enforceability - of the German neighbouring right for press publishers.Why a CJEU reference? [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 9:51 pm
The case, Alasaad v. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 6:52 am
Importantly, with respect to the union’s “Takings Clause” argument, the appeals court found that the district court got it right in ruling that the claim was ripe, and dismissed the claim with prejudice in light of Sweeney (International Union of Operating Engineers Local 139 v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:15 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court of Canada issued its decision [Google Inc v Equustek Solutions Inc, 2017 SCC 34] in the important and longstanding litigation between Equustek Solutions and Google, concerning an issue that has become particularly sensitive over time: can Google be ordered to de-index results from its search engine globally, ie in respect of all country versions of its search engine? [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 7:15 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court of Canada issued its decision [Google Inc v Equustek Solutions Inc, 2017 SCC 34] in the important and longstanding litigation between Equustek Solutions and Google, concerning an issue that has become particularly sensitive over time: can Google be ordered to de-index results from its search engine globally, ie in respect of all country versions of its search engine? [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
Google (see “Case Law, Hamburg District Court: Max Mosley v. [read post]
30 May 2017, 3:26 am
He ordered the BBC to answer a question as to whether the source of its story was someone within Operation Yewtree. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:03 pm
He ordered the BBC to answer a question as to whether the source of its story was someone within Operation Yewtree. [read post]
26 May 2017, 10:42 am
” Attorney General Jeff Sessions has promised to appeal the case, International Refugee Assistance Project v. [read post]
14 Jan 2017, 8:41 am
* Amanda Scardamaglia & Angela Daly, Google, Online Search and Consumer Confusion in Australia, (2016) 42(3) International Journal of Law and Information Technology 203: Australian consumers lack understanding about the operation and origin of the different elements of the Google search results page. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:29 am
But in Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union, AFL-CIO v. [read post]
2 Jan 2017, 12:18 pm
At a minimum the party to be bound must be shown to have been aware of the Terms and Conditions at the time of purchase: see Kobelt Manufacturing Co v Pacific Rim Engineered Products (1987) Ltd, 2011 BCSC 224 at para 124, 84 BLR (4th) 189. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
