Search for: "Law v. Siegel" Results 101 - 120 of 635
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Apr 2022, 6:39 am by Tracy Thomas
Equal Protection and Abortion: Brief of Equal Protection Constitutional Law Scholars Serena Mayeri, Melissa Murray, and Reva Siegel as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents in Dobbs v. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 6:51 am by Ronald Mann
To compare – the justices spent 76 minutes hearing argument in the 11 o’clock case on the preceding day, Siegel v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 7:46 am by Howard Friedman
Siegel & Melissa Murray, Equal Protection and Abortion: Brief of Equal Protection Constitutional Law Scholars Serena Mayeri, Melissa Murray, and Reva Siegel as Amici Curiae in Support of Respondents in Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 9:30 pm by ernst
The amicus brief of Serena Mayeri, Melissa Murray, and Reva Siegel in Dobbs v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 2:04 pm by Holly Brezee
This mental association is not law, and Kirby sued for Copyright rights. [read post]
28 Feb 2022, 3:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In EDJ Realty, Inc. v Siegel  2022 NY Slip Op 01147 Decided on February 23, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department affirmed dismissal of a legal malpractice claim concerning a notice of appeal from a hybrid complaint against the DHCR. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 6:39 am
Three constitutional law scholars, Serena Mayeri, Melissa Murray, and Reva Siegel, argue that... the Mississippi law violates equal protection because it relies on outdated stereotypes about women’s roles as maternal figures in society..... [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Writing about Hellerin the Harvard Law Review, Yale Law Professor Reva Siegel explained how “[t]he New Right embraced originalism as the jurisprudential vehicle for . . . [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Writing about Hellerin the Harvard Law Review, Yale Law Professor Reva Siegel explained how “[t]he New Right embraced originalism as the jurisprudential vehicle for . . . [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 8:26 pm by David Kopel
Professor Kopel one coauthor a law review article with Professor Moody, and presented an empirical study by Moody in an amicus brief in McDonald v. [read post]