Search for: "Lay v. Lay"
Results 101 - 120
of 7,588
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2008, 10:48 am
T Mobile (UK) Ltd and another v Office of Communications [2008] EWCA Civ 1373; [2008] WLR (D) 391 “A challenge to a the decision of the Office of Communications (’Ofcom’) concerning the award of wireless telegraphy licences lay by way of a claim for judicial review and not an appeal to the Competition Appeal Tribunal (’CAT’). [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 8:29 am
Koster v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 9:48 pm
After nearly three years of discovery, the parties in the massive Viacom v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 6:14 am
Supreme Court decided in TC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 4:18 am
Nor do plaintiffs concerns with respect to his bankruptcy proceeding provide a reasonable excuse for that failure (see Pipinias v J. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:24 pm
In Stone v. [read post]
31 May 2012, 2:41 pm
The temporal scope of the desk audit phase of an OFCCP compliance review can be extended beyond the date that the contractor received its audit scheduling letter, ruled the Labor Department’s Administrative Review Board (ARB), reversing an 2010 ruling by an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) in favor of federal contractor Frito-Lay, Inc (OFCCP v Frito-Lay, Inc, ARB Case No 2010, May 8, 2010). [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 3:00 am
Standard Fire at Use in Practice in Arkansas Deaton v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:29 am
This is the ruling of Mr Justice Arnold late last month in Innovia Films Ltd v Frito-Lay North America Inc [2012] EWHC 790 (Pat), in the Patents Court (England and Wales). [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 11:25 pm
We continue to anxiously await the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board’s decision in Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2012, 9:28 am
Lay. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
T-Mobile (UK) Ltd and Another v Office of Communications Court of Appeal “An appeal from a decision of the Office of Communications (Ofcom) concerning the award of wireless telegraphy licences lay by way of judicial review and not to the Competition Appeal Tribunal. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:57 pm
v=25aDP7io30U; Ron Paul, , Are We in a Clash of Civilizations? [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 4:00 am
Recent revisions to Ontario statutes lay a foundation for the enforceability of automated agreements. [read post]
21 May 2017, 8:23 pm
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress testimony — Lay witness A jury in the Circuit Court for Washington County convicted appellant, Gary Watkins, of two counts of possession of a controlled dangerous substance (“CDS”) with intent to distribute, two counts of possession of heroin, two counts of possession of cocaine, and one count of possession ... [read post]
21 May 2017, 8:14 pm
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress testimony — Lay opinion William Taylor, appellant, was convicted by a jury, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, of burglary in the fourth degree and assault in the second degree. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 1:12 pm
He challenges the trial judge’s decision to admit two pieces of testimony, one on the grounds that it was irrelevant and inadmissible, and the other as improper lay opinion ... [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 5:52 pm
(mother) v. [read post]
18 Nov 2013, 2:47 am
The post Case Preview: Hook v British Airways and Stott v Thomas Cook appeared first on UKSC blog. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 5:06 pm
On October 21, 2010, plaintiffs filed their opposition to the petition for certiorari filed by Wal-Mart in Dukes v. [read post]
