Search for: "Leathers v. United States"
Results 101 - 120
of 140
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 May 2012, 1:14 pm
David LaChapelle v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:14 pm
David LaChapelle v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 1:14 pm
David LaChapelle v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 11:28 am
Whole Foods[24] and United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 6:02 am
And in United States v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 12:58 am
– All-Party Parliamentary IP Group (IPKat) United States US General On hiring an employee of your competitor: Bimbo Bakeries v. [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:11 am
Here, the TTAB held that "[t]he fact that applicant is a foreign entity that is representing itself without previous experience in United States trademark procedure cannot avoid a finding of fraud. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm
United States (1962). [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 10:14 am
This position is to be contrasted with other jurisdictions such as the United States which has varying degrees of protection for personality rights and the right of publicity at state level. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 12:08 pm
Law - United States - Services - Business and Corporate Law - Lawyers and Law Firms [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:59 pm
Bakke (1977); and Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Sep 2022, 8:32 am
United States: two second-degree murder convictions overturned after three days of police questioning in the absence of counsel. 1944 Ashcroft v. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 6:08 am
Importation of rabid animals into the United States has broad public health implications. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
On 2 July 2019, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion in Case C-240/18 P Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), advising that the EUIPO’s decision to reject the registration of the trade mark ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ because it was too offensive should be annulled. [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:33 am
” Similarly, in Germany in Nokia v Daimler, the Mannheim court stated that the “royalty provided in [Daimler’s] counter-offer is not reasonable, as the reference value used in the top-down approach in the form of the average purchase price of [TCUs] is unsuitable. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 8:48 am
A lesson for brand owners – Dispute over ILLICIT mark (International Law Office) Nigeria How not to create a new name: Lessons from NiGaz (Afro-IP) Poland Trade mark issues on a geographical name of gmina (Class 46) South Africa Independent Communications Authority of SA publishes position paper on whether there is a need to reform laws relating to copyright ownership in commissioned works (Afro-IP) South African authors seek first public lending right in a… [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:43 pm
That’s the question raised in the case of State of Florida v. [read post]
1 Oct 2016, 6:04 pm
Homeopathic medicine was heralded upon its entry into the United States in 1835, primarily because –unlike traditional medicine of the time – it didn’t kill patients (like mercury tinctures) and wasn’t gross (like leaching). [read post]
9 Mar 2023, 3:03 pm
In the United States, trademark rights are acquired through exclusive, continuous use, not registration. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 3:45 pm
MSRP policies are lawful under United States v. [read post]
