Search for: "Lemley v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 340
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2018, 6:17 am by Terry Hart
But that still leaves over forty states. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 7:20 am by Dennis Crouch
Iancu is likely to prove more immediately impactful to the status quo than the accompanying decision in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:30 am by Dennis Crouch
The recent non-precedential opinion of Automated Tracking Solutions v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:56 am by Lisa Ouellette
Although the case only involves § 271(f) on supplying components from the United States (also at issue in Life Tech. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 11:56 am by Lisa Ouellette
Although the case only involves § 271(f) on supplying components from the United States (also at issue in Life Tech. v. [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 5:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Lemley, Raizel Liebler, Barry McDonald, Tyler Ochoa, Aaron Perzanowski, Betsy Rosenblatt, Rebecca Tushnet, and David Welkowitz.) [read post]
1 Nov 2017, 2:58 pm by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The final group of amicus briefs were filed this past week in Oil States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2017, 3:20 am by Scott Bomboy
“This Court cannot countenance a claim by the Governor and Legislature of a State that there is no duty on state officials to obey federal court orders resting on this Court's considered interpretation of the United States Constitution in Brown v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 9:51 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Some IP Survey casebooks, including the Merges, Menell, and Lemley book, include the Anderson v. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 6:21 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Oil States Energy Services, LLC, v. [read post]
11 Aug 2017, 8:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Procedural: qui tam structure (addressing fraud on the public, misuse of a state grant). [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 12:56 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Only 4 cited © cases: Mazer v. [read post]
12 May 2017, 5:46 am by Terry Hart
Solicitor General responded to the Supreme Court of the United States’ request last October for guidance on whether it should take up the case of Lenz v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:30 am
Part V examines the intervention of a number of 3D printing companies in a Supreme Court of the United States dispute in Star Athletic v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 8:30 am by Christine Corcos
Part V examines the intervention of a number of 3D printing companies in a Supreme Court of the United States dispute in Star Athletic v. [read post]