Search for: "Lemon v. Kurtzman" Results 101 - 120 of 127
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2022, 5:59 pm by Amy Howe
But the Supreme Court had not applied the Lemon test – the three-part test, named after the court’s 1971 decision in Lemon v. [read post]
19 May 2020, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
The so-called “Lemon test,” which the Court announced in Lemon v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 1:12 pm by Carl Esbeck
” Though at times overly involved with verbal formulae that proved of little utility, such as three prongs in Lemon v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 11:26 am by John Elwood
Kurtzman, Van Orden v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
  At this point, Justice Fruchter jumped in to recite the three prongs of the test first articulated in Lemon v. [read post]
12 Sep 2016, 11:00 am by Erwin Chemerinsky
Cohen) and greatly restricted the ability of the government to give aid to parochial schools (Lemon v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 11:32 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Because I believe that such a state establishment of religion violates both the purpose and effects prongs of Lemon v. [read post]
6 May 2014, 1:00 pm by Erwin Chemerinsky
  Both liberals and conservatives thus believe that there are likely five votes to overrule the test from Lemon v. [read post]
2 Jun 2023, 5:34 am by Rick Garnett
A short version, though, is that, a little more than 50 years ago, in Lemon v. [read post]
7 Mar 2021, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
Under the (perhaps largely defunct) “Lemon test” from Lemon v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 11:00 am by Jana Singer
  Purporting to apply the three-part Establishment Clause test from Lemon v Kurtzman, the Court found that it was a permissible secular purpose “to alleviate significant governmental interference with the ability of religious organizations to define and carry out their religious missions. [read post]