Search for: "Lewis, S. v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 3,830
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2023, 10:02 am by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
Last month, the Sixth Circuit issued an important Fourth Amendment decision regarding searches of electronic devices, United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2016, 4:30 am by koherston
All the way back in 1999, the trial court approved the parties’ agreed order establishing paternity, awarding custody to Mother, ordering Father to pay Child’s birth expenses and medical insurance, and stating that the parties agreed no additional child support should be owed. [read post]
  In addition to finding that Liskow’s removal satisfied federal question jurisdiction, the Court found that the removal satisfied the requirements of CAFA and the Court accepted Liskow’s arguments against the application of CAFA’s local controversy and home state exceptions and CAFA’s governmental entity exclusion. [read post]
  In addition to finding that Liskow’s removal satisfied federal question jurisdiction, the Court found that the removal satisfied the requirements of CAFA and the Court accepted Liskow’s arguments against the application of CAFA’s local controversy and home state exceptions and CAFA’s governmental entity exclusion. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 8:21 am by scanner1
Lewis DA 18-0567 2019 MT 92N Civil – Amount Due Matter of A.B., YINC DA 18-0300 2019 MT 91N Civil – Dependent Neglect State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 4:36 am
Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York filed its brief (available below) with the Second Circuit in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 11:55 am
Here is the abstract:This article -- part of a symposium on the Supreme Court's 2008 decision in Medellin v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:44 pm
More details can be found after the jump or at [law.wlu.edu].On Monday, September 17 beginning at 8:45 am, the Washington and Lee School of Law will host a symposium, sponsored by the Lewis Law Center, examining how Justice Powell's concurrence in Branzburg v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 11:33 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
  Justice Sotomayor’s opinion keeps tribal employees on equal footing with federal and state employees and decides the import of indemnification provisions – really have nothing to do with Indian law and instead having everything to do with government employee indemnification law. [read post]
16 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
(The following essay by IntLawGrrl Hope Lewis is cross-posted from a SCOTUSblog symposium on Arizona v. [read post]