Search for: "Lewis v. Anderson" Results 101 - 120 of 147
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2008, 2:57 pm
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, December 17, 2008 US v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 3:29 am by Peter Mahler
In opposition, relying on Lewis v Anderson, 477 A.2d 1040 [Del Sup Ct 1984], and its progeny, the plaintiff contended that the reverse stock split was effectuated for the “sole” and “fraudulent” purpose of eliminating her standing to maintain her derivative claims originally brought in New York and later re-filed in Delaware, and on that ground should be rescinded. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 9:30 am by Staley Smith
Circuit ruling last week, Zoe Bedell presented us an overview of the DC Circuit’s Opinion in Al Bahlul v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Opinion below (5th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Brief amicus curiae of Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America (in support of petitioners) Brief amicus curiae of National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers (in support of petitioners) __________________ Docket: 07-1295 Case name: Lewis v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  If this seems too bleak a view of the Court, consider that this is exactly what the Court did in Vega v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 2:56 am by Peter Mahler
  The Zelouf Case Last month’s decision by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Shirley Werner Kornreich in Zelouf v. [read post]
17 Dec 2017, 3:28 pm by Wolfgang Demino
The article, penned by lawyers at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, finds it curious that the courts in Madden didn’t resurrect and apply the VALID-WHEN-MADE doctrine, which even the authors admit has a scant grounding in recent caselaw. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
In the UK in FAPL v BT [2017] Mr Justice Arnold concluded that the High Court has the jurisdiction to make an order against an access provider that would require the ISP to block access not to a website but rather streaming servers giving unauthorised access to copyright content - 'live' blocking. [read post]