Search for: "Li v. Greene" Results 101 - 120 of 337
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Dec 2023, 9:43 am by Jocelyn Bosse
Whilst images of organic growth were used in the second half of the eighteenth century as emblems of authorial originality, in the early 2000s, they were instead mobilised by cultural environmentalists:as figures of the commons and the public domain that, formerly lush green pastures, were now depleted by the excessive production and protection of patents and copyrighted works.The other two chapters turn to the conceptualisation of nature in patent law. [read post]
29 Apr 2015, 4:09 am by David DePaolo
”Opt-out proponent and president of non-subscription specialty broker PartnerSource, Bill Minick, told WorkCompCentral that "Oklahoma’s highest court has given the green light for a truly competitive marketplace for workers’ compensation. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
As a result, Greene won’t be able to revive his libel suit. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 8:22 am by Eric S. Solotoff
The Court believes the risk lies in barring Plaintiff’s claim. [read post]
2 Dec 2014, 5:00 am by Sally Peat
In 2008, the House of Lords gave judgment in R v Davis [2008] UKHL 36; [2008] 1 AC 1128. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Zelo Street has also published a blog post about Kavanagh entitled ‘Sun pundit’s lies exposed. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 2:31 am
The final question in the Commission’s Green Paper (which, incidentally, deserves praise for its concise and focussed presentation of the issues), covers other suggestions for reform of the Regulation’s rules not falling under any of the previous headings. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
Parliamentarians, including former Brexit Secretary David Davis, former Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell and Green MP Caroline Lucas and human rights organisations have called on the retail group owned by Mike Ashley to stop using facial recognition surveillance in their stores. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 5:32 am by Susan Brenner
The difference between a permissive adverse inference instruction and a mandatory adverse instruction lies in the impact on the finder of fact, e.g., the jury. [read post]