Search for: "Linda Jess"
Results 101 - 120
of 176
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2018, 4:00 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse remarks on an enduring legacy of the late President George H.W. [read post]
28 May 2009, 8:45 pm
" Friday in The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin will have an article headlined "Legal Realism Informs Judge's Views. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 2:16 pm
NPR's Nina Totenberg weighs in here on the school decisions; Linda Greenhouse reports here in today's New York Times; Jess Bravin and Daniel Golden of the Wall Street Journal have this frontpage article; and this editorial runs in today's Boston Globe. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 1:37 am
Other coverage comes from Nina Totenberg of NPR, Richard Wolf of USA Today, and Jess Bravin of The Wall Street Journal. [read post]
12 Feb 2010, 9:30 am
At the Opinionator Blog of the New York Times, Linda Greenhouse examines the recent deal as well. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 6:51 am
Savage of the Los Angeles Times, Mike Sacks of the Huffington Post, James Vicini of Reuters, Jesse J. [read post]
15 Nov 2009, 7:42 pm
What's next: Jesse Jackson stages a press conference for the next trumped up Duke Lacrosse Team "scandal" and nobody shows up? [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:45 am
” And in The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports on efforts to remove the Confederate flag from license plates in other states. [read post]
1 Jun 2012, 7:11 am
At ACSblog, Linda Greenhouse discusses her new book about the Supreme Court. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
” Briefly: Elsewhere in the Supreme Court Brief (subscription required), Mauro reviews Sisters in Law, Linda Hirshman’s new book on Justices Sandra Day O’Connor and Ruth Bader Ginsburg. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 7:44 am
It all started with Shafer's characteristically over-the-top call to abolish "the ugly stranglehold the boomers have over the press," which he evidently sees possible with the replacement of 61-year-old boomer Linda Greenhouse with 47-year-old boomer Adam Liptak. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:29 am
” At Slate, Kristin Collins and Linda Kerber argue that the Court should strike down a law that distinguishes mothers and fathers of foreign-born children for citizenship purposes. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 3:57 am
” For The Wall Street Journal, Jess Bravin reports that “[t]he case is the latest in a string of decisions that have given the 1925 Federal Arbitration Act wide powers to displace traditional legal remedies, prioritizing business interests in reducing liability over providing redress to consumers and employees alleging injuries. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
At the WSJ Law Blog, Jess Bravin has a post on the McDonald’s menu preferences of several current and past Justices, elicited in response to a query by a prankster posing as a ten-year-old child. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
” At the National Review’s Bench Memos blog, Ed Whelan responds critically to Linda Greenhouse’s recent New York Times column on the court’s July 24 order involving Nevada’s coronavirus-related restrictions for churches. [read post]
11 May 2010, 8:17 am
At the New York Times’ Opinionator blog, Linda Greenhouse similarly expresses hope that Kagan will provide substantive answers at her confirmation hearings. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:10 am
In The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse looks back at last week’s oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
Jan. 19-23, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:38 pm
Jesse Stark Western District of Michigan at Marquette 09a0053n.06 Devereaux v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 4:14 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse contends that the soon-to-be-announced outcome in Janus v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 4:33 am
” In an op-ed for The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse weighs in on the question of whether and when appellate judges may consult the facts outside the record in a case, suggesting that “there should be a line between facts — and attitudes — that judges can apply to the matter at hand, and those they can’t. [read post]
