Search for: "Little v. American Medical Systems Inc." Results 101 - 120 of 225
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2010, 12:41 pm by Erin Miller
 United States (09-979); British American Tobacco v. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 5:24 am by Andrew Frisch
NASCO, Inc., 111 S.Ct. 2123, 2133 (1991) (court may per inherent power assess attorneys fees when a party has acted in bad faith, vexatiously, wantonly, or for oppressive purposes); Roadway Express, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2020, 8:59 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More importantly, they state that it is medically desirable to do so. [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 10:00 am
Lesson learned from a business survey’ (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (IAM) Speakers discuss technology transfer for climate change; within academic settings (Intellectual Property Watch) The ‘dirty little secret of patents’ is that most are worthless to their owners. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 1:15 pm by Bexis
  First of all, a lot more stuff slips under the radar screen in state court, especially on the trial court level (where very little ends up reported), than in federal courts, where Westlaw and Lexis get a much greater percentage of the total results using PACER (a nationwide electronic docketing system).With state courts, we’re much more dependent upon what our readers send us. [read post]
5 Aug 2012, 2:35 pm by Mark Zamora
Any reference or suggestion or the introduction of any evidence by the defense counsel directly or indirectly attacking the American Court System or plaintiffs attorneys or recent tort reform campaigns.Neither the American tort system or plaintiffs attorneys in general are on trial in this case. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 6:31 am
– FCA orders jail time for contempt of court on basis of disobedience of earlier injunctions: Deckers Outdoor Corporation Inc. v Farley (No 8) (Patentology) (IPKat) FCA: Copyright in medical records: Primary Health Care Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation (IP Whiteboard) Are those real? [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
Some creditors do not seek attorney’s fees at all while others claim and regularly obtain egregious amounts of fees in cases which see little attorney involvement because they are handled in litigation-mill fashion. [read post]
13 Oct 2008, 12:12 pm
ECJ clarifies rules relating to notice: K-Swiss Inc v OHIM (Class 46) EU Competitiveness Council resolution against counterfeiting and piracy (Class 46) EU states back three-point anti-piracy plan (Managing Intellectual Property) Fuel cells and wind power lead European patent filings for clean energy technology (Green Patent Blog) More non-minor geographical indicator (GI) amendments published (Class 46) No sign of any Community patent progress, despite Verheugen's optimism… [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 1:01 pm by Bexis
Danek Medical, Inc., 520 S.E.2d 88, 92 (N.C. [read post]