Search for: "Long v. Arnold"
Results 101 - 120
of 564
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
These four matters had been covered by the record label claimants and so Arnold J had no difficulty in finding all four matters established. [read post]
11 Jul 2013, 11:44 am
Click on Case to Download or View - Jones v. [read post]
22 Apr 2020, 4:00 am
Arnold v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 2:47 pm
SAS Institute Inc v World Programming Ltd [2013] EWCA Civ 1482 is a Court of Appeal, England and Wales, ruling from last week on an action that seems to have been going on for rather a long time -- which indeed it has. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 7:47 am
A few short but busy weeks have passed since the IPKat first received word of Vestergaard Frandsen A/S and others v Bestnet Europe Ltd and others [2009] EWHC 657 (Ch) and its sequel at [2009] EWHC 1456 (Ch), these being Chancery Division for England and Wales judgments of Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
28 May 2013, 1:45 am
Mr Justice Arnold. [read post]
3 Dec 2014, 4:45 am
Not long after, Elonis was fired from his job at an amusement park after coworkers made at least five sexual harassment complaints against him. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 8:43 am
” Often confused for Brussels I, this oneBrussels sprout spends his days sittingin court rooms adding little value to the proceedings... Mr Justice Arnold noted that, as long as validity of the foreign patents was not put in issue, Lilly accepted that the effect of the Supreme Court decision in Lucasfilm v Ainsworth was that the Moçambique rule did not apply to questions of patent infringement. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 2:59 pm
That didn't take long! [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 1:03 pm
” After this long windup, Smith says, “Is there a question there, your honor? [read post]
17 Sep 2019, 4:30 am
Golub v Shalik, Morris & Co., LLP 2019 NY Slip Op 32589(U) September 3, 2019 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 158055/2017 Judge: Barbara Jaffe is worth reading, simply for the long description of all the argument for/against malpractice, continuing representation, damages in a tax case, the application of future estate taxes and how a court reads this all. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 4:35 am
Arnold J found the marks were infringed and that there had been some passing off too. [read post]
22 Apr 2018, 8:40 am
The court sided with Arnold J’s decision and found the patent to be invalid. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 10:33 am
Arnold v Britton [2012] EWHC 2451(Ch) is the third holiday chalet / service charge case we’ve covered in short order (the other two are here and here). [read post]
19 Feb 2015, 1:39 pm
The (alleged) hoity-toity backgrounds of the justices—underscored in a January 22, 2015 Washington Post piece—came into laser focus in oral arguments in Rodriguez v. [read post]
19 Nov 2014, 1:33 pm
Bradley Smith of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “Can I be arrested without evidence against me? [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 12:53 am
Phonographic Performance Limited v Fletcher is an extempore ruling by Mr Justice Arnold, sitting in the Chancery Division, England and Wales, last Monday; being extempore it isn't available on BAILII but it was noted in brief on the subscription-only Lawtel service. [read post]
19 May 2009, 5:25 am
Other participating firms in addition to Dechert (Joe Hetrick's the conference co-chair): Reed Smith, Arnold & Porter, King & Spalding, and Pepper Hamilton for our side and Cohen, Placitella, Raynes McCarty, and Seeger Weiss representing the other side of the "v".For a complete list of the pairings and the topics see the conference brochure. [read post]
22 Nov 2010, 11:30 am
” The Judge had concluded that this fell within the meaning of the term “deactivated” in the claim as it was considered unnecessary for the pump to be switched off so long as it was “rendered sufficiently less active that no more fluid is pumped into the canister. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 7:40 pm
Littebrant, 55 AD3d 1151, 1154, [2008] [juror with professional and long-term personal relationship with key defense witness properly excused for cause]; People v Bedard, 132 AD3d 1070 [3d Dept 2015] [friendship with District Attorney required granting of a for cause challenge]; People v. [read post]
