Search for: "Lord v. Collins" Results 101 - 120 of 220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2012, 12:29 pm by Matthew Flinn
At the time Mitting J gave his judgment, this House of Lords judgment had not been handed down, and although he was aware of the decision of the Strasbourg decision, he was strictly bound by the earlier decision of the Court of Appeal decision in SSHD v AF. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
Collins Rice J ruled that a hearing should take place to decide whether the posts were statements of fact or opinion. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
On 29 June 2023,  Collins Rice J granted an injunction in the case of WFZ v BBC [2023] EWHC 1618 (KB) restraining publication by the BBC of a report in a form which identified the claimant as the subject of active criminal proceedings. [read post]
26 Apr 2015, 4:36 pm by INFORRM
Baron & ors v Collins and Baron & ors v Vines, heard 20 April 2015 (Warby J). [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 12:00 am by Samantha Knights, Matrix.
  In short the majority held that a breach of public law which bears on and is relevant to the decision to detain is sufficient to give rise a cause of action in false imprisonment (per Lord Dyson at §68 with whom Lords Hope, Walker, Collins, Kerr and Lady Hale agreed). [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm by Matthew Flinn
In DPP v Collins [2006] 1 WLR 2223 Lord Bingham said: Section 127(1)(a) does of course interfere with a person’s right to freedom of expression. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 4:56 pm by INFORRM
In DPP v Collins [2006] 1 WLR 2223 Lord Bingham said: Section 127(1)(a) does of course interfere with a person’s right to freedom of expression. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:18 pm by Gilles Cuniberti
The Conference will be chaired by The Rt Hon the Lord Collins of Mapesbury, Justice of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In January, Lord Justice Warby had delivered summary judgment in her favour, setting aside for later only the copyright point of the possible second author of the letter. [read post]
17 Aug 2021, 6:40 pm by Michael Douglas
Available at Westlaw Australia. [5] Alex Mills, Party Autonomy in Private International Law (CUP, 2018) 53, citing Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co v Shand (1865) 16 ER 103. [6] Alex Mills, The Confluence of Public and Private International Law (CUP, 2009), 53. [7] Antony Gibbs & Sons v Société Industrielle et Commerciale des Métaux (1890) 25 QBD 399, 405 (Gibbs). [8] Alex Mills, Party Autonomy in Private International Law (CUP, 2018) 56,… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:22 am by Gilles Cuniberti
For Lord Collins, this was a contrario evidence that the parties to the Agreement really took seriously who the formal parties to each contract would be: Pakistan first, but the Trust only next. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
Mr Arden [QC for Camden] referred also to the decision of the House of Lords in Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins [2002] AC 301, relating to the definition of “a dwelling-house let as a separate dwelling” in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988. [read post]
24 Feb 2013, 9:19 am by NL
Mr Arden [QC for Camden] referred also to the decision of the House of Lords in Uratemp Ventures Ltd v Collins [2002] AC 301, relating to the definition of “a dwelling-house let as a separate dwelling” in section 1 of the Housing Act 1988. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 7:24 am
This month's selection is more on the technology side than the IP side, but it is not without significance for IP enthusiasts.There are two decisions from the Queen's Bench Division of the High Court for England and Wales that deal with internet postings - Bunt v Tilley on the status of internet service providers as "publishers" in defamation law and Al Amoudi v Brisard on whether there exists a presumption that an internet posting has taken place within the… [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 12:39 am by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 8 June 2022 there was a directions hearing the case of Hills v Fomukong Epse Tabe before Collins Rice J. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 9:53 pm
At renewed permission to appeal hearing, Lord Justice Lawrence Collins considered whether this case raised a point of principle or practice in relation to the two part test of s.193(7F) set out in Slater v London Borough of Lewisham [2006] EWCA Civ 394 and applied in Ahmed v Leicester City Council [2007] EWCA Civ 843. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:02 am by chief
The judgments of Baroness Hale of Richmond JSC and Lord Hope of Craighead DPSC are expressed in terms which appear sanguine about this - see for example Baroness Hale at paragraph 33 and Lord Hope at paragraph 54. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 10:02 am by chief
The judgments of Baroness Hale of Richmond JSC and Lord Hope of Craighead DPSC are expressed in terms which appear sanguine about this - see for example Baroness Hale at paragraph 33 and Lord Hope at paragraph 54. [read post]