Search for: "Lord v. Lord"
Results 101 - 120
of 6,610
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2023, 8:33 am
” The trial Judge’s decision was based on various authorities, from Fielding v Variety Inc [1967] 2 QB 841 (CA) to BHX v GRX [2021] EWHC 770 (QB), and the lower court ultimately dismissed the libel and slander claims for want of serious harm. [read post]
10 Dec 2023, 4:59 am
Carly Forrest et al, Lexology: Vicarious Liability in Scotland – the retreat continues: on the recent Inner House judgment in C & S v Shaw and Live Active Leisure [2023] CSIH 36. [read post]
9 Dec 2023, 8:13 pm
In any case, Price v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:47 pm
Lundbeck A/S v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 12:24 pm
(Check for commentary on CanLII Connects) Sattva Capital Corp. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm
R (UNISON) v. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 3:06 pm
Lights of New York, the first all-talking full-length feature film, will also enter the U.S. public domain in 2024, as will Edgar Rice Burroughs’ novel Tarzan, Lord of the Jungle, and Wanda Gág’s Millions of Cats, which is the oldest American picture book still in print. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 7:41 am
In this post, Phil Woodfield and Elizabeth Lombardo of CMS comment on the Supreme Court’s decision in Canada Square Operations Ltd v Potter [2023] UKSC 41, which was handed down on 15 November 2023. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 4:00 am
Particular care is required before deploying it, as Lord Sales’s analysis in R (Imam) v London Borough of Croydon [2023] UKSC 45 amply demonstrates. [read post]
4 Dec 2023, 2:21 am
The Data Protection and Digital Information Bill has passed through the House of Commons and will now proceed to the House of Lords for consideration. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm
The Supreme Court, in Lord Sales judgment, restates the starting position, as per R v East Sussex County Council, Ex p Tandy (1998) AC 714, that where Parliament imposes a statutory duty on a public authority to provide a specific benefit or service, it does so on the footing that the authority must be taken to have the resources available to comply with that duty. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 8:00 am
The working group will also hear a presentation comparing the privacy risks of legacy v. non-legacy systems. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 3:39 am
However, a Member of the House of Lords, Lord Holmes of Richmond, has proposed a Private Members’ Bill. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm
In the November 7 oral argument in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Surprise at the outcome is not enough to engage the revisionary powers of our Lord Justices of Appeal.As ever, the Court of Appeal, led by Arnold LJ, concluded that there was nothing wrong with the judge’s multifactorial assessment on this occasion. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 7:38 am
In this post, Pippa Borton, Associate at CMS, previews the decision awaited from the Supreme Court in Kireeva v Bedzhamov. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
Corp. v Resurrection Temple of Our Lord, Inc. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 10:37 am
Former Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, Tom Bingham, in his book “The Rule of Law”, while explaining the rule of fair trial cited a House of Lords’s case “Regina v. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 6:56 am
From McQueen v. [read post]
