Search for: "Lurk v. United States" Results 101 - 120 of 353
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2013, 11:40 am
Yesterday was the 50th anniversary of the day in 1963 when the United State Supreme Court issued its landmark ruling of Brady v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 11:04 am
There are nasty surprises lurking in the text below.Use of this site is governed by our Terms of Use Agreement and Privacy Policy.TERMS OF USE AGREEMENTWelcome to this Web site. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 8:13 am by Fred Yarger
He filed an amicus brief for the state in support of the church in Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:17 am by Addie Rolnick
In general, though, legal Indianness requires indigenous ancestry (descent from a group indigenous to what is now the United States) and some kind of political recognition. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 12:19 pm by WIMS
Supreme Court in the landmark case, Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association et al v. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 1:36 pm by Venkat
") __ This is a good a time as any to mention a few other domain name enforcement cases that are lurking around (some are a few months old, but still worthy of a mention): Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 6:56 am by Nabiha Syed
United States, and Smith v. [read post]
19 May 2014, 1:50 pm
Counting both federal and state court decisions, it’s the seventeenth consecutive judicial win for same-sex marriage advocates since the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 1:58 pm by Peter Hirtle
It is very difficult to determine whether works are in the public domain in the United States. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 5:16 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The first marriages by same-sex couples were celebrated in the United States in May 2004, as a result of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court’s ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]
3 May 2021, 8:03 am by Ekow Yankah
United States – which the Supreme Court will hear on Tuesday in the final argument of its 2020-21 term – packs so many swirling issues of great importance into an absurdly little case, it can hardly be believed. [read post]