Search for: "M/V LORD"
Results 101 - 120
of 914
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jul 2021, 3:50 am
Greg Lambert 6:21 Oh, my lord. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 11:20 am
Mazurek, John M. [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 6:10 am
However, I’m not sure the problem, assuming it is one, exists in the family law context. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 11:32 am
I’m pretty sure I’ve owned several such pans, but I’m not sure I knew they were unique to Tefal. [read post]
9 May 2021, 4:07 pm
Negligence at the Breach: Information Fiduciaries and the Duty to Care for Data, Connecticut Law Review, Forthcoming, Daniel M. [read post]
8 May 2021, 4:50 am
S v. [read post]
2 May 2021, 4:46 pm
On 28 and 29 April 2021, the Supreme Court (Lord Reed, Lady Arden, Lords Sales, Leggatt and Burrows) heard the Google appeal against the Court of Appeal’s 2 October 2019 decision ([2019] EWCA Civ 1599). [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 4:52 pm
M&S, which has lodged an intellectual property claim with the high court, has three trademarks relating to its caterpillar cake, including the words “Colin the Caterpillar” and the packaging. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 4:41 pm
Information Design for Differential Privacy, Ian M. [read post]
28 Mar 2021, 1:21 pm
This was the approach taken by Linden J in R (on the application of M) v London Borough of Newham [2020] EWHC 327 (Admin) (our note). [read post]
23 Mar 2021, 12:52 pm
From Business Leaders in Christ v. [read post]
13 Mar 2021, 1:50 am
Y esa claridad hace innecesaria la utilización de cualquier otro método de interpretación (» in claris non fit interpretatio»), como reiteradamente ha establecido este Tribunal Supremo (por todas, baste citar nuestra STS n. [read post]
12 Mar 2021, 9:57 am
In the Supreme Court's recent standing decision, Uzuegbunam v. [read post]
5 Mar 2021, 6:03 am
Silk, Sabastian V. [read post]
21 Jan 2021, 1:34 pm
Further, Lord Hodge in R(N) v Lewisham had expressly addressed s.188(3) accommodation and held “accommodation pending a review does not make the property a home or a property “let as a dwelling””. [read post]
17 Jan 2021, 11:45 am
All of the elements of the claim that could be discerned from Mr M’s narrative Particulars either amounted to “full frontal attacks on the findings of the Judge’, and were thus an abuse of process, or the sort of decision that that a court can and should determine summarily as amounting to no more than an error of judgment rather than negligence, to use the words of Lord Steyn in Arthur JS Hall v Simons. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 11:01 am
Deconstructing Rubin v Eurofinance SA and its impact on the recognition and enforcement of foreign insolvency judgments at common law” It was Lord Hoffmann who once spoke of a “golden thread” of modified universalism running throughout English Insolvency Law since the eighteenth century. [read post]
2 Jan 2021, 2:01 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Dec 2020, 9:17 am
AB v London Borough of Barnet. [read post]
20 Dec 2020, 9:56 am
Here's what Darren writes:Retromark Volume VIII: the last six months in trade marks by Darren Meale As awful as this year has been, I’m constantly reminding myself how lucky us lawyers are. [read post]
