Search for: "M S International Inc" Results 101 - 120 of 3,633
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Dec 2023, 11:16 am by Eric Goldman
The law, in its preamble, stated these objectives: WHEREAS, the People’s Republic of China is an adversary of the United States and Montana and has an interest in gathering information about Montanans, Montana companies, and the intellectual property of users to engage in corporate and international espionage…. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 8:10 pm by Ann Pearson
What I’m hearing from a compliance perspective is this would be similar to a paralegal role where you’re constantly looking up what’s the court rule or how can we follow it to the letter? [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am by INFORRM
The ICO is seeking permission to appeal the ruling on Clearview AI Inc handed down by the First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights) on 17 October 2023. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 1:14 am by centerforartlaw
“… Showcase[s] the concept of stars surrounding a beautiful gem, just like Earth. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 9:09 pm by Ilana Korchia
In response to this investigation, California Splendor, Inc. of San Diego, California voluntarily recalled certain lots of 4-lb. bags of Kirkland Signature Frozen Organic Whole Strawberries that were sold at Costco stores in Los Angeles, California; Hawaii; and two San Diego, California business centers. [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Those of you who work in the compliance function are leaders inside your organization and through proactive internal engagement you will be better prepared to discharge your duties. [read post]
18 Oct 2023, 1:52 pm by Sasha Volokh
That's not how the strict scrutiny cases state the test, so I'm inclined to say my absolutism is warranted here. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm by NARF
Abousleman (Water Rights; Winters Doctrine) Jeremiah M., Hannah M. and Hunter M., et al. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
  This principle was articulated in In re Caremark International Inc. [read post]
Treasury Department that funding provided to the Internal Revenue Service under the Inflation Reduction Act would not be available to make up for a lapse in appropriations and funding gaps across the agency, which will result in the IRS having to furlough about 66 % of its workforce. [read post]