Search for: "M. R. C. Corp. v. U. S" Results 101 - 114 of 114
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2010, 2:09 pm by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
Corp., 172 F.Supp.2d 1018, 1033 (S.D.Ill.2001)(Food and Drug Administration) (“FDA’s drug labeling decisions impose only minimum st [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
: Trek Bicycle Corporation v Trek Winery, LLC (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) District Court C D California: No preliminary injunction in ‘Planet [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
: Trek Bicycle Corporation v Trek Winery, LLC (Trademark Blog of the Trademark Lawyer's Mind) District Court C D California: No preliminary injunction in ‘Planet [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 3:06 am
Miller (Lewis and Clark), Judith V. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 9:28 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
Legend Classic Homes, Ltd and Legend Home Corp.Appeal from County Civil Court at Law No 2 of Harris County (Houston)Trial Court Judge: Jacqueline Lucci-SmithM E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O NAppellant, Claude LeFoumba, prevailed in arbitration against the appellees, Legend Classic Homes, Ltd. and Legend Home Corp. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
(Tangible IP) Global IP law: Two recent publications ‘Global Challenge of Intellectual Property Rights’ by R Bird and S C Jain and ‘Global Intellectual Property Law’ by G Dutfield and U Suthersanen (IPKat)   Global - Trade Marks / Brands What price brands on the balance sheet? [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
If certification is denied, these cases wither on the vine.[5] C. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 2:00 pm
Muselevich JJett Appraisals Appraisal - Residential / Commerical 3 Richard Maltz David R. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 10:24 am
Miles, Posner on Economic Loss in Tort: EVRA Corp v Swiss Bank, 74 U Chi L Rev 1813 (2007) Martha Nussbaum, Carr, Before and After: Power and Sex in Carr v Allison Gas Turbine Division, General Motors Corp, 74 U Chi L Rev 1831 (2007) Randal C. [read post]
9 Oct 2006, 5:12 pm
The Board granted the General Counsel's motion for partial summary judgment as to the following paragraphs and Appendixes of the compliance specification: Paragraphs 1-5, 6(b), 7(b), 8(b), 9(b)-(e), 10-11, 15-16, 20-21, 34(a), 36-37, 41-42, 46-47, 50(a)-(b), 52-53, 57-58, 62-63, 67-68, 71(a)-(b), 73-74, 78-79, 88-89; Appendixes A, C, E, K, M, O, Q, S, U, W, Y, AA, and EE. [read post]
16 Feb 2006, 8:33 pm
Sobre el Plenario "Ramírez c/ Russo Comunicaciones e Insumos SA" ( Cámara Nacional de Apelaciones del Trabajo, 3 de febrero de 2006)Vamos a analizar aquí este caso (muy) importante, en los términos que se definieran antes, a pesar de no ser un fallo de la Corte Suprema. [read post]