Search for: "MALEE v DISTRICT COURT" Results 101 - 120 of 2,022
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Sep 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Western District of New York, seeking monetary and injunctive relief (enjoining the continuation of such discriminatory practices).In a written statement announcing the settlement, EEOC’s Jeffrey Burstein, regional attorney for the New York District Office, noted, “The EEOC appreciates Corning’s willingness to make critical changes to its line lead hiring process, changes that we believe will lead to the advancement of… [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 1:30 pm by Greta Ravitsky and Tammy Tran
Despite acknowledging that the scheduling policy was discriminatory on its face, the district court granted the employer’s motion to dismiss, reasoning that the plaintiffs’ prima facie case lacked a necessary element set forth as binding precedent in Dollis v. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 8:00 am
District Court, District of South Carolina (Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 4:07 am by SHG
District Judge Alan Johnson disposed of the case swiftly. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
" The Supreme Court elaborated on the fundamental liberty of parents two years later in Pierce v. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (EEOC v. [read post]
11 Aug 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the District of Colorado (Equal Employ­ment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
29 Jul 2023, 4:40 am by SHG
” Lawrence III, supra, at 803; see Arroyo Gonzalez v. [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Northern District of Mississippi, Oxford Division (EEOC v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 8:00 am
District Court for the Western District of Michigan, seeking monetary damages for the impacted employee’s “emotional distress,” together with an award of punitive damages.In a written statement, an EEOC Senior Trial Attorney, Dale Price, noted, “An employer cannot condone a work environment where a female employee is degraded and threatened because of her sex or wait until it is presented with a protection order before it decides to act …. [read post]