Search for: "MARK S."
Results 101 - 120
of 125,220
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2019, 7:44 am
(“Wells Fargo”), through its substitute trustees, Mark S. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:22 am
(“Wells Fargo”), through its substitute trustees, Mark S. [read post]
15 Jul 2014, 1:42 pm
Foundation has named Mark Butler, president and CEO of Ollie’s Bargain Outlet, as chairman of the board of directors. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 9:15 am
The parties disagreed, however, on whether the relevant public established a link between the marks at issue, and whether Bottari’s mark took unfair advantage of, or was detrimental to, the earlier mark’s distinctiveness and repute. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 9:13 pm
Notably, the protection of the defendant's freedom of art and freedom of expression did not encompass the right to register a trade mark for similar or identical goods.The Bundesgerichtshof's press release for this case can be found here (in German). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 10:55 am
” Merely descriptive marks would be things like “Bob’s Computer’s. [read post]
2 Oct 2006, 2:22 pm
Supreme Court found in a case involving the marks VICTORIA’S SECRET and VICTOR’S LITTLE SECRET. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 7:27 am
In the months following the Federal Circuit's decision in Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 12:25 pm
Unsurprisingly, in view of the paper's recent campaign to open up the family justice system, the piece concentrates upon Sir Mark's comments favouring the allowing of the media into certain cases ("subject to provisions to protect the anonymity of children, or indeed the parties in appropriate cases"), although Sir Mark makes it quite clear that this is primarily to deal with "largely misplaced criticisms of 'secret… [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 1:22 pm
The full text of the Manager's Amendment is available for review here. [read post]
21 May 2012, 3:30 am
Writing for a unanimous panel, Judge Boyce Martin (of Louisville) ruled that Maker's Mark has... [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 7:03 am
The court vacated its earlier dismissal of plaintiff's qui tam false marking claim because plaintiff's proposed amended complaint alleged "that [defendant] continued to mark the [accused] product insert with the [patent-in-suit] after being served with the first amended complaint. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 7:36 am
Common law trade-mark protection is great, but it's a lot of work and it can be very expensive. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 9:12 am
After five years of continuous use of a registered mark, the registrant’s right to use the mark in commerce for the goods or services identified in the registration may be made incontestable by filing an appropriate declaration or affidavit with the USPTO. [read post]
11 May 2012, 4:46 pm
San Diego - The trademarked red wax top of Maker's Mark Distillery's bourbon is here to stay. [read post]
11 Dec 2022, 9:56 am
In essence, it considered that there was no likelihood of confusion between the marks at issue and that the evidence submitted by the applicant in order to demonstrate the acquired distinctiveness of the earlier mark through use was not sufficient for that purpose.The General Court’s judgmentThe applicant relied on a single plea in law, namely infringement of Articles 60(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) EUTMR.The present analysis only concerns the applicant’s claim… [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 1:04 am
The defendants have no right to use the aforementioned trade mark/s of the plaintiffs and that too in respect of same goods. [read post]
7 Nov 2023, 8:37 am
Notably, this case marked the SEC’s first instance of addressing high-frequency trading manipulation, and it underscored the SEC’s commitment to pursuing market manipulators, irrespective of their trading sophistication. [read post]
21 Mar 2009, 10:52 pm
" - Mark Lunsford To The Clark County Ohio Prosecutor's Office There is something about Mark Lunsford that smells more rotten than a bucket of chum that's been sitting on a Florida beach for days. [read post]
25 May 2010, 11:25 am
Following up on yesterday's post on false marking, I learned today via Docket Navigator that at least one Court rejected a false patent marking defendant's argument that, as a matter of pleading, affixing an expired patent number to a product could not be actionable. [read post]
