Search for: "MARVEL SMITH"
Results 101 - 120
of 157
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Mar 2011, 11:24 pm
Maron Marvel (girl-on-girl sexual harassment in, of all places, Delaware).Why does Martone v. [read post]
31 Dec 2015, 5:12 am
Full disclosure: David is a Reed Smith case, so this entry is also non-RS.Sergeants Benevolent Ass’n Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am
See “Silicon Valley Engineer Convicted In Marvell Trade Secrets Case. [read post]
21 May 2023, 6:00 am
Introduction Speech act theory will forever be associated with the great J. [read post]
14 Nov 2010, 11:51 am
Introduction Speech act theory will forever be associated with the great J. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 11:48 am
Introduction Speech act theory will forever be associated with the great J. [read post]
10 Jul 2016, 4:08 pm
On the same day, Warby J heard an application in the case of Theedom v Nourish Trading Ltd Green J also heard an application in the case of Smith v Persons Unknown. [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm
The brief argues that a conclusion against national injunctions on the basis of Article III would be "awesome," in the sense of so marvelous as to inspire awe, because it "would forever constrain Congress' power" (26). [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 12:36 pm
.* Letter from AmeriKat: Spiderman's web ensnares the US Supreme Court in Kimble v MarvelAnnsley gives an account of US Supreme Court’s decision in Kimble v Marvel, relating to a toy-patent allowing children to role-play as a "spider person" by shooting webs "from the palm of [the] hand" by way of pressurized foam string.* Patent Déjà vu - Hospira v Genentech and another patent diesDarren sinks his claws in the latest decision in… [read post]
17 Nov 2018, 12:29 pm
The brief argues that a conclusion against national injunctions on the basis of Article III would be "awesome," in the sense of so marvelous as to inspire awe, because it "would forever constrain Congress' power" (26). [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 6:00 am
For the Symposium on Jonathan Gienapp, The Second Creation: Fixing the American Constitution in the Founding Era (Belknap Press, 2018).The Second Creation: Fixing the American Constitution in the Founding Era is a marvelous study of the earliest debates over constitutional language, meaning, and interpretation. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 7:30 pm
Although the AmeriKat will miss hearing about his latest advocacy adventures and having the opportunity to marvel at how quickly he can assimilate hundreds of pages of expert reports in consultation, she is looking forward to digesting and reporting on Mr Justice Carr's IP judgments for years to come. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
After Smith’s murder, and the migration of the faithful to Utah, the leaders of the church espoused, and practiced, polygamy quite openly. [read post]
3 Oct 2021, 4:18 pm
Roberts-Smith is suing the Age, Sydney Morning Herald and Canberra Times for defamation relating to a series of reports published in 2018 that alleged he committed war crimes. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 9:31 am
It’s sort of like watching Neo fight all the agent Smiths in The Matrix Reloaded: we know our hero can’t possibly die, and he doesn’t act like he’s in any danger whatsoever, so the entire fight is a foregone conclusion and the audience becomes bored out of their skulls. [read post]
28 Sep 2007, 2:16 pm
I have been writing for years here at "Adam Smith, Esq. [read post]
22 Jul 2007, 11:06 am
It is, in this sense, the shift from the heroic virtues chronicled by Walter Scott to the bourgeois and commercial, distinctly unheroic, virtues of, say, the Scottish enlightenment - the time of Adam Smith, David Hume, Adam Ferguson, pragmatists all (see the marvelous essay on this very subject by Marvin B. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Polo Publicity and Trade LTD; Marvel Comics vs. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 10:36 pm
(Afro-IP) Elections, patents and injunctive relief in Nigeria (Afro-IP) Switzerland Virgin considers move to Switzerland for its IP licensing business (IP finance) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): Patent valid, in part, not infringed: ConvaTec v Smith & Nephew (IPKat) (PatLit) UK Supreme Court: Star Wars helmets did not infringe copyright because they are not art: Lucasfilm v Ainsworth (Out-Law) (Art and Artiface) (1709 Blog) (IPKat) (Class 99) (IP finance) (IP Whiteboard)… [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 11:24 pm
Polo Publicity and Trade LTD; Marvel Comics vs. [read post]
