Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P" Results 101 - 120 of 5,351
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
That, perhaps, is where it matters most—as it affects the lives and realities of individuals who are both rights and risk bearers of human rights and its impacts. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 5:59 am by Przemysław Roguski
Austria is the first State to advance the proposition that a cyber activity that causes the destruction of governmental data in the data embassy of state A in the territory of state B, may be considered a violation of sovereignty of both state A and state B. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
The Act made no exception for spouses—or, for that matter, other family members. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm by Josh Blackman
The Act made no exception for spouses—or, for that matter, other family members. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 7:17 am by Alex Phipps
Here, defendant failed to make a motion before the district court, and “[p]er North Carolina law . . . for a defendant to properly object to a trial by citation, [they] must make such objection before the court of original jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:47 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Live testimony of a vocational expert can occur only on a showing of good cause [ see [b], below ]. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm by Administrator
 79(3), (4) and (7), 1993 CanLII 119 (SCC), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 839, at p. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:18 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
“You changed the way we eat, created a delicious revolution and a world where people finally, finally understand that eating is an ethical act and that our food choices really matter. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am by Joshua Weisenfeld
” The Federal Circuit further reasons that “[p]rinted matter encompasses what is communicated—the content or information being communicated—rather than the act of a communication itself. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am by Giles Peaker
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]