Search for: "MATTER OF B P B P"
Results 101 - 120
of 5,351
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2024, 2:32 pm
b. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 10:02 pm
Rules of international jurisdiction in divorce matters. [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 8:31 am
§ 1836(b)(3)(D); 12 Pa. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 6:20 pm
That, perhaps, is where it matters most—as it affects the lives and realities of individuals who are both rights and risk bearers of human rights and its impacts. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 5:59 am
Austria is the first State to advance the proposition that a cyber activity that causes the destruction of governmental data in the data embassy of state A in the territory of state B, may be considered a violation of sovereignty of both state A and state B. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:00 am
The Act made no exception for spouses—or, for that matter, other family members. [read post]
23 Jun 2024, 8:38 pm
The Act made no exception for spouses—or, for that matter, other family members. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 8:21 am
B. [read post]
21 Jun 2024, 3:30 am
Put simply, “[b]odies matter. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 7:17 am
Here, defendant failed to make a motion before the district court, and “[p]er North Carolina law . . . for a defendant to properly object to a trial by citation, [they] must make such objection before the court of original jurisdiction. [read post]
19 Jun 2024, 5:47 am
Live testimony of a vocational expert can occur only on a showing of good cause [ see [b], below ]. [read post]
12 Jun 2024, 1:06 pm
79(3), (4) and (7), 1993 CanLII 119 (SCC), [1993] 1 S.C.R. 839, at p. [read post]
11 Jun 2024, 5:18 pm
“You changed the way we eat, created a delicious revolution and a world where people finally, finally understand that eating is an ethical act and that our food choices really matter. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 11:28 am
” The Federal Circuit further reasons that “[p]rinted matter encompasses what is communicated—the content or information being communicated—rather than the act of a communication itself. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
James P. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 6:00 am
James P. [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 2:20 pm
" (Ibid., p. 1). [read post]
9 Jun 2024, 9:40 am
The review decision in part stated I refer to R v Oxford CC ex p Doyle (1997) concluding that a Child Arrangement Order does not mean the Children are reasonably expected to live with both parents. [read post]
6 Jun 2024, 2:06 pm
Both (A) and (B).D. [read post]
5 Jun 2024, 7:00 am
P. 60(b)(2). 4 decisions. [read post]