Search for: "MATTER OF D V"
Results 101 - 120
of 22,869
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Aug 2011, 2:26 pm
COOLEY, DANIEL COOLEY, BRIAN COOLEY, DARREN COOLEY, CALLIE RECH, d/b/a COOLEY RANCH, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 6:37 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: CIVIL – OTHER DA 5-0392, 2016 MT 45, CHARLES E. [read post]
12 Nov 2009, 3:39 am
Perpetual Trustee Co Ltd and another v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Ltd and another Butters and others (joint administrators of WW Realisation 8 Ltd and another) v BBC Worldwide Ltd and others [2009] EWCA Civ 1160; [2009] WLR (D) 322 "The anti-deprivation rule, which as a matter of public policy prevented parties from contracting out of the [...] [read post]
14 May 2012, 2:24 am
Neilly v The Queen [2012] UKPC 12; [2012] WLR (D) 144 “When a defendant in a criminal trial had not been put on an identification parade, the decision as to whether to allow a dock identification was a matter for the trial judge in the light of all the relevant circumstances. [read post]
10 Mar 2010, 2:55 am
Shell UK Ltd v Total UK Ltd; Total UK Ltd v Chevron Ltd [2010] EWCA Civ 180; [2010] WLR (D) 67 “A defendant who could reasonably foresee that his negligent actions would damage property owed a duty of care to a beneficial owner of that property. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:17 am
RICHARD D. [read post]
22 Aug 2019, 9:59 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- Earlier this month, in Genetic Veterinary Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 3:51 pm
Although some of you thought that the trivia question below about D. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 1:12 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0330, 2010 MT 271N, TODD PETERSON and HAROLD PETERSON, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 2:28 am
Silkstone and another v Tatnall and another [2011] EWCA Civ 801; [2011] WLR (D) 230 “While a party to a reference before a Land Registry adjudicator under section 73(7) of the Land Registration Act 2002 could not be prevented from withdrawing his case, the adjudicator had a discretion as to whether, in all the circumstances, he should make an order terminating the reference, and on what terms, or continue to determine the substantive matters raised by the… [read post]
21 Nov 2013, 8:19 pm
The recent case of Vitol Bahrain EC v Nasdec General Trading LLC and others [2013] All ER (D) 38 (Nov) provides an interesting insight into how the courts may interpret proportionality under the new test. [read post]
3 Feb 2010, 2:09 am
Byers and others v Yacht Bull Corpn and another [2010] EWHC 133 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 18 “A claim to beneficial ownership of a yacht did not fall within the exception contained in art 1(2)(b) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters so that the Regulation did not apply to ‘proceedings relating to the winding up of insolvent companies’. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 4:54 am
Regina (Modhej and another) v Secretary of State for Justice: [2012] EWCA Civ 957; [2012] WLR (D) 210 “Where the Court of Appeal allowed an appeal against sentence at a time by which, subsequent to the original passing of sentence, the law had changed in relation to release on licence, it was not the case that reliance could be placed on the particularities of such date in order to claim that it was the later provisions which governed… [read post]
26 Jul 2023, 7:21 pm
The Matter of Grace v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 11:12 am
"After fully reviewing the matter, we adopt the finding gs of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the referee's report. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 6:41 am
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0086, 2010 MT 171N, DOUGLAS MILLER, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 2:59 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0096, 2010 MT 35, LINDA PRESCOTT, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0025, 2010 MT 227, MONTANA BOARD OF PHARMACY, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:22 am
G v de Visser (Case C-292/10); [2012] WLR (D) 87 “Where it was impossible to locate the whereabouts of a defendant, European Union law did not preclude the issue of judgment by default in circumstances where the document instituting proceedings had been served by public notice under national law, provided that the court seised of the matter had first satisfied itself that all investigations required by the principles of diligence and good faith had been undertaken to… [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:25 am
Regina v Newell [2012] EWCA Crim 650; [2012] WLR (D) 105 “A statement made on a plea and case management hearing form by the defendant’s counsel, although admissible in principle as a matter of law, should not, in the exercise of the court’s discretion under section 78 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (‘PACE’), be admitted in evidence against the defendant at trial, provided that the case had been conducted in accordance with the… [read post]
