Search for: "MATTER OF E K D K" Results 101 - 120 of 1,192
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It is points C [according to which “distant source of information” had to be interpreted broadly and did not contain any limitation as to the nature of the information, including the second structure menus disclosed in D2] and D [according to which any page could be a point of access (porte d’entrée)] that correspond to the [points] which have, according to the petitioner, been raised by the BoA during the OPs, contrary to all expectations. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:44 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
., a/k/a "Dawg" and "Junior," 48, of Southfield, MI ANTHONY BERNARDE EDWARDS, a/k/a "Ant" and "Mick," 40, of Southfield, MI DARYL KEITH SEWELL, a/k/a "D-Nice," 43, of Arizona MALCOLM MARTINES LONG, a/k/a "Black," 38, of Macomb Township, MI ISAAC JOHNSON SHEPPARD, 30, of Detroit, MI CARL LEE JONES, a/k/a "Pookie," 30, of Farmington Hills, MI GEOFFREY LAMAR HIGHTOWER,… [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 2:44 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
., a/k/a "Dawg" and "Junior," 48, of Southfield, MI ANTHONY BERNARDE EDWARDS, a/k/a "Ant" and "Mick," 40, of Southfield, MI DARYL KEITH SEWELL, a/k/a "D-Nice," 43, of Arizona MALCOLM MARTINES LONG, a/k/a "Black," 38, of Macomb Township, MI ISAAC JOHNSON SHEPPARD, 30, of Detroit, MI CARL LEE JONES, a/k/a "Pookie," 30, of Farmington Hills, MI GEOFFREY LAMAR HIGHTOWER,… [read post]
8 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
The beta-casein A2, A3, D and E variants contain a proline at position 67 whereas in the beta-casein variants A1, B, C and F proline-67 is substituted by a histidine (see page 13, lines 24 to 27). [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
It therefore provides the means to stop applicants, in reply to the first communication, dropping existing claims, replacing them by switching to unsearched and non-unitary subject-matter extracted from the description, i.e., claiming different subject-matter in sequence rather than simultaneously (T 274/03 [4], T 915/03 [3], T 1285/11 [2]). [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 9:07 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Larry Darnell Belfield, a/k/a “Donnnie” or “D,” 29, of Newport News, Va. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 1:00 am by Hull and Hull LLP
If a matter was not commenced on the Estates List, yet falls into one of the categories mentioned above, the matter can be transferred to the Estates List on consent, or on a motion, to either a judge who is hearing the matter (but not sitting on the Estates List), or a judge sitting to hear matters on the Estates List. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
This was the more so, since the example apparently does not correctly represent the claimed subject-matter because the conductivity of the loading buffer is not stated, an additional wash step is carried out and not all contaminants are removed. [18] R 27(1)(e) EPC 1973 [NB: and R 42(1)(e) EPC 2000] stipulates that the description shall “describe in detail at least one way of carrying out the invention claimed using examples where appropriate and referring to the… [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
As a matter of fact, the existing interests (Interessenlage) are the same. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:34 pm by Howard Knopf
CMEC is to be commended for pursuing this matter. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
”[3.4] In the present case […] the ED summoned to OPs indicating that claims 1 and 15 lacked clarity and that the subject-matter of these claims lacked novelty in view of D3. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The Guidelines for examination, E-VIII 1.6, further explain that for any communication raising a matter of substance – such as in the present case – a request for extension, even if filed without reasons, should normally be allowed if the total period set does not thereby exceed six months. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
However, due to the application of the restriction means within a gastric band the use of a gas for inflation is excluded as a matter of fact. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 1:29 pm
“[E]ssentially,” the plaintiff was accusing the defendant of “not compl[ying] with FDCA Section 510(k). [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 3:49 pm
(o) for the passing of accounts,(p) fixing and approving the remuneration of a personal representative, or(q) subject to subrule (2), respecting any other matter concerning(i)   an authorization to obtain estate information,(ii)   an authorization to obtain resealing information,(iii)   a grant of probate,(iv)   a grant of administration with or without will annexed,(v)   an ancillary grant,(vi)   a resealing, or(vii)   the office of personal… [read post]