Search for: "MATTER OF MENTAL HEALTH OF T J D" Results 101 - 120 of 196
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2017, 7:08 am by MBettman
  When the probable-cause hearing took place, Morgan stipulated that there was probable cause that he had committed the charged offenses, and the judge ordered a social and mental health evaluation and scheduled an amenability hearing. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:08 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Ninth Circuit has also adopted Justice White’s approach in upholding a California law prohibiting mental health practitioners from providing sexual orientation change efforts therapy to children under the age of 18. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 7:38 am
King, 162 N.H. 629, 631, 34 A.3d 655 (2011) (stating that Gagne governs the defendant's supplemental request for an in camera review of the privileged records of the Mental Health Center of Greater Manchester). [read post]
8 Nov 2016, 6:37 pm by Kenneth Vercammen, Esq.
Nella's first will was executed on November 8, 2011, while she was hospitalized for both physical and mental health issues, according to hospital records. [read post]
16 Jul 2016, 8:59 am by Eric Goldman
Fortunately for my mental health and your reading queue, I’m pleased to report that today’s case has better–and more succinct–news. [read post]
19 May 2016, 6:02 pm by stevemehta
”  Section 15610.57, in turn, defines “neglect” in relevant part as “[t]he negligent failure of any person having the care or custody of an elder or a dependent adult to exercise that degree of care that a reasonable person in a like position would exercise. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
This past year was an eventful one in the corporate and securities litigation arena, with the U.S. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 2:40 pm by familoo
There was also guidance issued in relation to the approval of consent orders – judges were reminded care was needed even when parties appeared to have agreed matters. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 1:49 pm by John Elwood
Finally, the main event: the Court apparently relisted in two new cases this week, both of which implicate interesting First Amendment issues, and both of which will leave close watchers of the Court’s docket with a sense of déjà vu. [read post]