Search for: "MATTER OF R L T" Results 101 - 120 of 3,882
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2021, 1:20 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Div. of Occupational & Prof’l Licensing of Dep’t of Commerce, 240 F.3d 871, 875 (10th Cir. 2001) (quotation marks omitted). [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 5:53 am
Then you got some whoppers of excuses as to why the charges weren't the employee's. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 10:01 am by Florian Mueller
Outside the sections in which the court summarizes the parties' pleadings without stating its own opinion, it mentions the key term "stipulation por autrui" only once (the bottommost paragraph on page 10):"Si les fondements juridiques des demandes dirigées contre l'ETSI et les sociétés PHILIPS sont différents (les premières sont fondées sur le contrat d’association qui régit les rapports entre… [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 12:39 pm
Les quatre conditions objectives et subjective : l'action frivole doit avoir été initiée ou maintenue par le défendeur, un jugement défavorable au défendeur doit l'avoir terminée, l'action frivole n'était basée sur aucun motif raisonnable, et elle doit subjectivement avoir été initiée ou continuée avec l'intention de nuire.Une telle… [read post]
24 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
Furthermore, the Board held that as a direct result of the patentee’s own tactical choice, the matter of the appeal proceedings had been limited from the broader version of the claims to a much more restricted subject-matter by limiting the feature (g). [read post]
20 Aug 2018, 3:05 am
See Dial-A-Mattress I, 57 USPQ2d at 1813 (“Although the registration of the ‘(212) M-A-T-R-E-S-S’ mark is a ‘phantom’ mark, … ‘1-888-M-A-TR-E-S-S’ is the legal equivalent of the ‘(212) M-A-T-T-R-E-S-S’ mark. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
Nevertheless, [the opponent] is of the opinion that the remaining product claims are still directed to subject-matter excluded from patentability by A 53(b). [read post]
10 Sep 2021, 8:26 am
Nonetheless, the discussion itself may well have substantial implications for the tenor and trajectories of discussions about complicity as a matter of civil liability and as a factor in the way that complicity is understood both as a moral matter and as part of corporate responsibility to respect human rights under the 2nd Pillar of the UN Guiding Principles for Business and Human Rights and related normative standards. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 2:37 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Also, in the written procedure before the Opposition Division, there is no apparent attack on such a heating device subject matter which is based on E1 as the closest prior art and which combines E12. [read post]