Search for: "MATTER OF R P S" Results 101 - 120 of 6,736
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
ADJ14258730—WCAB Panel: Commissioners Capurro, Snellings, Chair Zalewski Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Board Panel Decision) Opinion Filed October 13, 2023 Injury AOE/COE—Substantial Medical Evidence—COVID-19—WCAB, granting reconsideration, rescinded decision in which WCJ found that decedent sustained injury in form of COVID-19 while employed by defendant as buyer on 12/4/2020, resulting in his death on 1/8/2021, and returned matter to WCJ for… [read post]
1 Jan 2024, 12:32 pm
Elérí Ípin, Ìbikeji Olódumarè, A-je-jù-Oògùn, Obìriti, A-p'ijó-ikú-da, Olúwa mi, A-to-i-ba-j'ayé, Òrò à-bi-kú-j'igbo, Olúwa mi, Ajiki, Ógégé a-gb'ayé-gún; Odúdú ti nídú orí emèrè; A-tún-orí-tí-kò… [read post]
31 Dec 2023, 4:00 am by Administrator
The Queen, [1971] S.C.R. 738, at p. 740). [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
This, among other things, because we reflect less, collectively, about them (these are issues that are not part of our public conversation); but also, because the levels of disagreement we show on such matters seem much higher. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
In today’s rapidly evolving corporate landscape, the composition of boards is not just a matter of compliance or social responsibility; it’s a strategic imperative that shapes the future of firms. [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am by Joel R. Brandes
    Conclusory and nonspecific allegations relating to a change in circumstances are insufficient to justify a hearing on a change in custody       In Matter of Wagner v Del Valle, --- N.Y.S.3d ----, 2023 WL 8246064, 2023 N.Y. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am by Ivo Emanuilov (KU Leuven)
Precise use of these concepts is therefore essential to properly assess a computer program’s technical contribution. [read post]
3 Dec 2023, 12:36 pm by Giles Peaker
The Supreme Court, in Lord Sales judgment, restates the starting position, as per R v East Sussex County Council, Ex p Tandy (1998) AC 714, that where Parliament imposes a statutory duty on a public authority to provide a specific benefit or service, it does so on the footing that the authority must be taken to have the resources available to comply with that duty. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 7:38 am by INFORRM
That was a threshold condition, and not question of discretion, R (Omar) -v- Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs [2014] QB 112 [30]. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:00 pm by Stephen Halbrook
  That's what prompted Barrett to make the above comment to Prelogar about "trying to save … the [R]ange issue. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 11:15 am by Rose Hughes
According to the Board of Appeal, for this requirement to be met, "the purported technical effect together with the claimed subject-matter need only be conceptually comprised by the broadest technical teaching of the application as filed" (r.11.10). [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am by Simon Lester
All these will render, in our opinion, this AS investigation a delicate matter, since the “threat of injury” assessments by the EC in similar circumstances have been sometimes annulled by the courts of the European Union (EU). [read post]