Search for: "MATTER OF R T"
Results 101 - 120
of 53,750
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Feb 2009, 11:11 am
Like any good lawyer, I need to add a disclaimer: Unfortunately, it is impossible to give comprehensive tax advice over the internet, no matter how well researched or written. [read post]
23 May 2013, 5:01 pm
If, on the other hand, it is doubtful whether that information is incorrectly defined, then a correction is ruled out (points [2] and [3] of the reasons).[3] The opinion G 3/89 of the EBA, supra, held furthermore that any correction under R 88 EPC 1973 (corresponding to R 139) is of a strict declaratory nature and thus has not to infringe the prohibition of extension of subject-matter under A 123(2) (see Headnote 2). [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm
T 708/00 [17], T 377/01 [3.1], T 274/03[5-6], T 915/03 [4 [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:03 am
Just posted to the Canadian Cloud Law Blog: Canadian Cloud Law Blog: Data location doesn't matter: US Federal Judge: In a decision that should not come as a big surprise, a US Federal Court judge has determined that the location of data under Microsoft's custody is not relevant. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
This decision deals with the following request for correction of the minutes of the oral proceedings (OPs) before the Board of appeal, filed on July 12, 2012:The Board explained that it did not see any reason to correct the minutes.The opponent replied as follows, on September 19, 2012:Here is what the Board had to say on that matter:*** Translation of the German original ***[1] Contrary to the opinion of the respondent/opponent 3, as far as the contents of minutes of OPs are concerned, the… [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 2:17 pm
'Pedigree' shouldn’t and doesn’t matter. [read post]
12 Jun 2013, 4:49 am
After a jury convicted him of “three counts of attempting to disseminate matter harmful to minors and possession of matter harmful to minors with the intent to disseminate it” in violation of Massachusetts General Laws 272 § 28, Milton R. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
The Board held this amendment to be a fair attempt to overcome the objection of insufficiency of disclosure raised by the respondent during the opposition procedure, R 80 EPC 1973. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 6:26 am
DOTY, JAMES T. and ELIZABETH GRUBA, DEO G. and JEANNE R. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 7:11 pm
Don’t talk to anyone until you talk to a competent lawyer. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 5:01 pm
See, e.g., decision R 2/08 [8.2].[4.5] As regards this complaint, therefore, and whichever way the matter is looked at, even if the petition were not clearly inadmissible it is clearly unallowable.Complaint # 4 also concerned the non-admission of requests[5.1] In respect of this complaint the petitioner raised an objection under R 106 which corresponds to the objection now raised. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 8:45 am
Republished by Blog Post PromoterAnd trademark law does’t evidently matter all that much to the Billings Gazette. [read post]
29 Dec 2012, 11:01 am
This is expressed, for example, in the provisions of R 51(4)-(6) and R 58(4)(5) [EPC 1973]. [read post]
13 Sep 2020, 9:59 pm
By Circuit Judge Paul R. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm
T 227/88; T 472/88 and T 922/94). [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 11:29 am
John Shimkus (R-Ill.) or any other politician for that matter. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 10:34 am
Media Matters hates Glenn Beck, but this montage is pretty damned entertaining, perhaps because the Fox News channel show is ending. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court to Arizona Fire District: Size Doesn’t Matter appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
9 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
Supreme Court to Arizona Fire District: Size Doesn’t Matter appeared first on HR Daily Advisor. [read post]
19 Nov 2020, 2:24 pm
To be clear, this isn’t a right or wrong issue. [read post]
